CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

breathe

Breathe integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Breathe data.

60

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/breathe/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with concrete CLI commands and a well-structured connection workflow featuring state-based feedback loops, held back slightly by redundant sections and a labeling inconsistency.

Suggestions

Remove the redundant `membrane action list` block in "Popular actions" or fold it into the earlier "Searching for actions" section.

Fix the "Step 2" references by numbering the workflow steps explicitly (e.g. Step 1: Connect, Step 2: Discover actions) so the cross-references resolve.

Trim the vague "Breathe Overview" tree (Session/Note/User/Profile) or replace it with concrete guidance on how those entities map to actions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient command documentation, but the vague "Breathe Overview" tree with "Use action names and parameters as needed" and the repeated `membrane action list` command in "Popular actions" could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

It provides copy-paste-ready `membrane` commands for login, connection ensure, polling, action run with JSON input, and proxy requests, plus a full flags table covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The install→authenticate→connect→poll-for-state→run sequence is clear with explicit state feedback loops (READY/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/CONFIGURATION_ERROR), but the unexplained "Step 2" reference with no labeled Step 1/2 is a minor gap.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

It is a single well-organized file with clear section headers and no bundle-file references, but at ~140 lines it exceeds the simple-skill threshold and has no one-level-deep references to push it to 5.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description answers both what and when and is anchored to a distinct named product, but its action vocabulary is generic and the trigger phrasing lacks natural synonyms or variations.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") with concrete Breathe operations such as employee records, absence/leave tracking, or performance reviews.

Broaden the trigger clause with natural user phrases, e.g. "Use when the user wants to manage employees, absences, or HR records in Breathe."

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Manage data, records, and automate workflows" names the Breathe domain and a few actions, but the verbs are generic rather than concrete operations, fitting the 1-2-actions-but-not-comprehensive anchor.

3 / 5

Completeness

It states what ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") and an explicit when ("Use when the user wants to interact with Breathe data"), but the when could be more specific, matching the both-present-but-could-be-sharper anchor.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Use when the user wants to interact with Breathe data" surfaces the product name and a relevant phrase, but lacks common variations or synonyms, matching the some-relevant-keywords anchor.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Naming the specific product Breathe gives it a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.