CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

bugzilla

Bugzilla integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Bugzilla data.

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/bugzilla/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a solid, largely executable guide: real commands, a well-handled connection state machine with retry guidance, and sensible best practices. Its main weaknesses are the redundant 'what is Bugzilla' intro, a 'Popular actions' section that contains no actual actions, and broken step cross-references ('Step 2', '1b') left over from an earlier structure.

Suggestions

Delete the introductory paragraph explaining what Bugzilla is and who uses it — Claude already knows this — along with the filler line 'Use action names and parameters as needed.'

Fix the workflow numbering: either replace 'skip to **Step 2**' with the actual section name and remove the orphaned '1b' heading, or restore a coherent Step 1/Step 2 structure.

Populate 'Popular actions' with 2-3 real Bugzilla actions or endpoints (e.g., searching bugs, creating a bug, commenting) so users get a concrete starting point instead of only a generic discovery command.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The opening paragraph ('Bugzilla is a web-based bug tracking system, allowing teams to track defects... commonly use it to manage the software development lifecycle') explains a concept Claude already knows, and filler like 'Use action names and parameters as needed' adds nothing. The rest is mostly efficient commands, so this sits at 'Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation' rather than 4, where only minor trimming would be needed.

3 / 5

Actionability

Commands are concrete and copy-paste ready throughout (install, login, connection ensure, action list/run with --input, proxy request with a full flag table). It falls short of 5 because no actual Bugzilla action or endpoint is ever shown — the 'Popular actions' section lists zero actions and the proxy example uses only a generic '/path/to/endpoint' placeholder.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The setup sequence is clear with a genuine state-machine feedback loop (BUILDING -> poll -> CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED -> user completes action -> re-poll -> READY, with CONFIGURATION_ERROR/SETUP_FAILED handling). It misses 5 because the cross-references are incoherent: 'skip to **Step 2**' points to a step that does not exist, and the '1b' heading is orphaned numbering with no Step 1a or Step 2.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

This is a single-file skill with no bundle files; sections are clearly headed (Install, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Running, Proxy, Best practices), navigation is easy, and there are no buried or nested references. Minor gaps — the proxy flag table and clientAction state reference sit inline where they are reasonable for this length — place it at 'Good structure; most content is appropriately placed' rather than 5, which expects well-signaled external references.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is distinctive and has an explicit 'Use when' clause, but it is thin on substance: the capability list is generic boilerplate ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') with no concrete Bugzilla-specific actions and no trigger synonyms. It reads as a template applied to an app name rather than a description of what this skill actually does with Bugzilla.

Suggestions

Replace the generic 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' with concrete Bugzilla-specific actions, e.g., 'Search and retrieve bugs, file new bugs, update bug status and assignments, add comments and attachments.'

Add natural trigger variations to the 'Use when' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user mentions Bugzilla, bug tracking, or filing/searching bug reports.'

State what the skill operates on concretely (bugs, attachments, users) so the 'what' answers what the integration actually does rather than pointing to the Overview section in the body.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('Bugzilla integration') but the actions are generic boilerplate — 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' could apply to any app, with no concrete bug-tracking actions like searching, filing, or updating bugs. It matches the anchor 'Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic' rather than 3, which requires 1-2 concrete actions.

2 / 5

Completeness

Both what ('Bugzilla integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows') and when ('Use when the user wants to interact with Bugzilla data') are present, but the what is vague and the when names no concrete triggers beyond 'Bugzilla data'. It is not 5, which requires concrete trigger phrases like 'when the user mentions Bugzilla, bugs, or bug tracking'.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'Bugzilla' is exactly the keyword a user would naturally say and appears twice, but no variations or synonyms are present (e.g., 'bug tracker', 'bugs', 'defects', 'issues', 'bug reports'). This matches 'Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms', not 4, which expects only a few natural terms missing.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Bugzilla' names a specific application niche and the 'Use when the user wants to interact with Bugzilla data' trigger is app-specific, so it is clearly distinguishable from other skills with minimal conflict risk, matching the 'Clear niche with distinct triggers' anchor.

5 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

membranedev/application-skills

Path

skills/bugzilla/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.