CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

builderall-mailingboss

Builderall Mailingboss integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Builderall Mailingboss data.

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/builderall-mailingboss/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body delivers strong, concrete CLI guidance with a well-validated connection setup flow, but it is diluted by padded intro material, an empty 'Popular actions' section, and broken step cross-references ('Step 2' is never defined). Fixing the numbering, removing filler, and adding one or two real action examples would make it fully executable and cohesive.

Suggestions

Fix the broken workflow cross-references: renumber the setup sections consistently (1a/1b plus a labeled Step 2) so 'skip to **Step 2**' points at a real section.

Either populate 'Popular actions' with 2-3 concrete Mailingboss actions (e.g. list subscribers, create campaign, send email) with example commands, or remove the section and keep the single 'Searching for actions' section to eliminate duplication.

Trim filler: remove 'Use action names and parameters as needed.' and compress the audience/marketing intro to one factual line, keeping the Membrane-over-manual-API guidance that earns its tokens.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient executable commands, but includes unnecessary padding: the marketing-style intro ('It's used by small business owners and entrepreneurs to build email lists...'), the no-op line 'Use action names and parameters as needed.', and a 'Popular actions' section that merely repeats the action-discovery command instead of listing actions. This matches anchor 3 — mostly efficient but with unnecessary explanation that could be tightened — rather than 4, where such padding would be only minor.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, executable commands appear throughout (npm install, membrane login with headless fallback, connection ensure with a real URL, polling with --wait, action run with --input JSON, and a proxy flags table). It falls short of anchor 5 because there is no worked example of an actual Mailingboss action — 'Popular actions' lists none and action calls remain <actionId> placeholders.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A real sequence is present (install → authenticate → connect → poll state → search → run → proxy fallback) and the connection flow has explicit state validation (READY / CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED / CONFIGURATION_ERROR), but the sequencing is undermined by incoherent cross-references — 'skip to **Step 2**' when no Step 2 exists, a '1b' section with no '1a' or '2' — and by no verification guidance after running actions. This matches anchor 3 (steps listed, checkpoints/gaps present) better than 4.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a standalone SKILL.md with no bundle files, and the body is well-sectioned with a clearly signaled one-level external link (official Builderall Mailingboss API docs). Content is appropriately inline for a skill of this size, matching anchor 4; the duplicate/empty 'Popular actions' section and mixed membrane vs npx command forms are the minor organization gaps keeping it from 5.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description answers both 'what' and 'when' and is well-anchored to a distinct product niche, but its capability language is vague ('manage data, records, automate workflows') and it omits the natural email-marketing terms users would actually say. Rewriting it around concrete Mailingboss capabilities and richer trigger terms would lift it substantially.

Suggestions

Replace the generic action phrase 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' with concrete capabilities, e.g. 'Create and send email campaigns, manage subscriber lists, and build automation workflows in Builderall Mailingboss.'

Expand the 'Use when' clause with natural trigger terms users would say, e.g. 'Use when the user mentions Mailingboss, Builderall email marketing, email campaigns, subscribers, or email lists.'

Keep the product name prominent (it is the strongest distinct trigger) while dropping the generic filler words 'data' and 'records' that dilute specificity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("Builderall Mailingboss") but its actions — "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" — are minimal and generic, with no concrete operations like creating campaigns or managing subscribers. It does not reach anchor 3 because 'manage data' and 'records' are not concrete action statements.

2 / 5

Completeness

It has both a 'what' ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") and an explicit 'when' ("Use when the user wants to interact with Builderall Mailingboss data"), matching anchor 4. It is not 5 because the 'what' lacks concrete capability language and the 'when' is generic ('interact with ... data'); not 3 because the 'when' is explicitly stated rather than weakly implied.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It includes the relevant product-name keywords ("Builderall Mailingboss", "automate workflows") but misses the natural phrases users would actually say, such as 'email campaign', 'subscribers', 'email list', or 'email marketing'. This matches anchor 3 (some relevant keywords, missing common variations/synonyms); not 2 because the product name itself is a genuinely specific trigger.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Everything is anchored to the specific product name, giving it a clear niche with low conflict risk; however, the generic words 'data', 'records', and 'automate workflows' create minor overlap risk with other email-marketing and automation skills, matching anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

membranedev/application-skills

Path

skills/builderall-mailingboss/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.