Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, highly actionable CLI guide whose connection-state handling is a strength, but workflow clarity is undermined by a dangling 'Step 2' reference and the absence of any validation guidance for destructive actions. Splitting the action catalog and proxy reference into bundle files would improve progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Fix the dangling reference: the text says 'skip to **Step 2**' and section '1b' implies a numbered flow, but no 'Step 2' heading exists — renumber the workflow steps consistently.
Add explicit validation/confirmation guidance for destructive actions (remove-list, delete-from-list, cancel-sms), e.g. verifying the list or contact with get-list/get-contact before deletion and confirming with the user.
Show a concrete parameter example for the most common case, e.g. membrane action run send-sms ... --input '{"listId": "...", "message": "..."}', and explain how action Keys map to the <actionId> argument.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dominated by lean, executable commands and compact tables, with only minor over-explanation — the fluff sentence 'It's used by businesses of all sizes looking to engage with their audience through mobile messaging' and the filler line 'Use action names and parameters as needed.'. This matches anchor 4 ('Efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed') rather than 5, where every token would earn its place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready commands cover install ('npm install -g @membranehq/cli@latest'), login, connection ensure, action list/run, and proxy requests with a flag table. Minor gaps keep it below 5: the parameter example is a generic placeholder ('--input '{"key": "value"}'' rather than a realistic send-sms payload), and how an action 'Key' from the table maps to an '<actionId>' is never shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (install → login → connection → search → run → proxy fallback) is present with explicit connection-state handling (READY / CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED / CONFIGURATION_ERROR), but there are gaps: the text says 'skip to **Step 2**' while no 'Step 2' section exists, and destructive actions (remove-list, delete-from-list, cancel-sms) appear in the actions table with no validation or confirmation guidance. Per the rubric, missing validation for destructive/batch operations caps workflow clarity at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | With no bundle files, the single document is organized into clear sections (Overview, Install, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Popular actions, Running, Proxy, Best practices) with no dangling or nested file references. It falls short of 5 because the 17-row action catalog and the proxy flag table are reference-style content inlined in SKILL.md that would fit better in separate one-level-deep reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |