Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with concrete, executable CLI commands and a clear connection state-machine flow, and it is reasonably concise. Its weaknesses are the absence of validation checkpoints around destructive/batch SMS actions and a monolithic structure with no reference-file split for the action and proxy catalogs.
Suggestions
Add a validation step before destructive/batch actions (e.g. confirm before cancel-sms, delete-from-list, remove-list, optout-list-member) and a verification step after send-sms using get-sms-delivery-status.
Move the full Popular actions table and the proxy flag reference into a references/ file (e.g. ACTIONS.md), keeping SKILL.md as a lean overview with a one-level-deep pointer.
Trim the opening product-description paragraph and remove the filler line "Use action names and parameters as needed." to tighten token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean CLI commands and a table with little padding, but the opening paragraph ("Burst SMS is a platform that allows businesses to send SMS messages...marketing, notifications, and alerts") and the filler line "Use action names and parameters as needed." could be trimmed. Not 5 due to these minor over-explanations; not 3 because commands are concrete and tight. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-pasteable `membrane` commands cover install, login (including headless completion), connection ensure/get with --wait, action list/run with --input, and proxy requests with a full flag table. Examples are executable and cover the common cases with real flags and JSON-output guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The install→login→connect→poll→search→run sequence is clear and the connection state machine even has a re-poll feedback loop, but destructive/batch actions (cancel-sms, delete-from-list, remove-list, optout-list-member, send-sms to a list) have no validation or verification checkpoints. Per the rubric, missing validation for destructive/batch operations caps this dimension at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned but is a single monolithic SKILL.md with no bundle files and no one-level-deep references, while the 17-row Popular actions table and the proxy flag table are inlined content that could live in a reference file. Not 4 because there are no separate-file references and a sizable action/flag catalog is inlined; not 2 because sectioning is solid. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |