CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

chattermill

Chattermill integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Chattermill data.

55

Quality

62%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/chattermill/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is an actionable, well-structured CLI integration guide with strong workflow checkpoints for connection setup. It would benefit from trimming the marketing intro and adding verification guidance for destructive proxy operations.

Suggestions

Remove the descriptive Chattermill marketing paragraph and the filler line 'Use action names and parameters as needed.' to tighten token usage.

Add a verification/check step before running destructive proxy requests (e.g. confirm method and path, or dry-run GET first) to satisfy the destructive-operations validation expectation.

Either flesh out the 'Chattermill Overview' section with concrete capability mapping or drop it to avoid a near-empty heading.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient with executable commands, but the marketing-style intro about what Chattermill is and the filler line "Use action names and parameters as needed." add unnecessary padding that could be trimmed.

3 / 5

Actionability

It provides concrete, copy-pasteable CLI commands (login, connection ensure, action list/run, request) plus a flags table, with only minor gaps such as placeholder CONNECTION_ID handling.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connection setup is a clear sequenced flow with explicit state-based checkpoints (READY/BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED) and a poll-then-revalidate feedback loop; minor gaps exist around validation for destructive proxy calls (DELETE/PUT).

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is organized into clearly headed sections (Install, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Running actions, Proxy, Best practices) with no bundle files needed, though the thin Overview section and inlined flags table leave minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description correctly pairs a what-when structure and leverages a distinctive product name, but its action list is too generic to be truly specific or comprehensive. Tightening the verbs into concrete Chattermill capabilities would lift specificity and trigger coverage.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs ('Manage data, records, automate workflows') with concrete Chattermill actions such as 'analyze feedback sentiment, surface themes, and filter survey responses'.

Expand the trigger clause with natural user phrases (e.g. 'Use when the user asks to analyze Chattermill feedback, themes, or survey sentiment').

Add specific trigger synonyms beyond the product name to improve natural-keyword coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the Chattermill domain but the listed actions — "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" — are generic abstractions rather than concrete capabilities, matching the 'names the domain but actions are minimal or generic' anchor.

2 / 5

Completeness

Both a 'what' ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") and an explicit 'when' ("Use when the user wants to interact with Chattermill data") are present, though the 'when' could be more specific about which tasks to engage for.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The natural keyword "Chattermill" appears with a trigger clause ("Use when the user wants to interact with Chattermill data"), but no synonyms or variations beyond the product name are given, fitting 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations'.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Tying the trigger to the named product "Chattermill" makes it mostly distinct with minimal overlap risk, but the generic action verbs ('manage data') leave a small chance of overlapping with other data-handling skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.