Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable, providing fully executable CLI commands with an explicit feedback loop for the fragile connection step, and is well-organized into clear sections. It is slightly held back by minor verbosity and loose workflow numbering.
Suggestions
Tighten the intro and remove filler like "so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing" to improve conciseness.
Replace the loose "skip to Step 2" references with an explicit numbered master sequence (1. Install, 2. Authenticate, 3. Connect, 4. Discover actions, 5. Run) to strengthen workflow clarity.
Consider moving the proxy flag reference table into a separate reference file so the SKILL.md overview stays leaner.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete commands and minimal padding, but contains minor over-explanation such as "so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing" and a brief product-background intro that could be trimmed, fitting the efficient-with-minor-trim anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides copy-paste-ready commands covering install, login (including headless), connection ensure, state polling, action list/run with JSON input, and proxy requests with a full flag table, fully executable and covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The install→auth→connect→search→run sequence is clear and the connection-polling section has an explicit validate/handle-CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/re-poll feedback loop, but the overall flow uses loose "skip to Step 2" numbering without a labeled Step 2 header, leaving minor structure gaps that keep it below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body is self-contained with clean section headers (Overview, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Running actions, Proxy, Best practices) and no nested references; it is well-organized though everything is inline in ~145 lines, fitting good-structure-with-minor-organization-gaps rather than an ideal overview-pointing-to-detail split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |