CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

clickfunnels-classic

ClickFunnels integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with ClickFunnels data.

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/clickfunnels-classic/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a strong, command-first integration guide: every operation ships an executable CLI command, and the connection flow includes an explicit state-machine with polling/validation checkpoints. Its main deductions are the boilerplate product intro, the absence of a concrete worked example for action runs, and a dangling 'Step 2' reference under incoherent section numbering.

Suggestions

Fix the broken navigation: the text twice says 'skip to **Step 2**' but no Step 2 exists and the only numbered section is '1b' — renumber the sections (install → login → connect → discover → run) or replace the Step 2 references with the actual section name.

Cut the intro paragraph explaining what ClickFunnels is and who uses it; keep only the official docs link, which is the one genuinely useful non-instruction line.

Add one concrete worked example of an action (e.g. a real action run command with a sample --input payload and the resulting output field) so users can pattern-match beyond the CONNECTION_ID/<actionId> placeholders.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient commands, but it opens with two sentences explaining what ClickFunnels is and who uses it ('ClickFunnels Classic is a platform that helps users build sales funnels and landing pages... primarily used by entrepreneurs, marketers, and small business owners') — a concept Claude already knows — plus small pads like 'This is the fastest way to get a connection.' This matches 'Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened'; it is above 2 because padding is limited to the intro, but below 4 because that intro and a few redundant asides should be trimmed.

3 / 5

Actionability

Nearly every section gives copy-paste-ready commands (npm install, membrane login, connection ensure, action list/run with --input JSON, proxy request with a flag table). This matches 'Mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps' — it is below 5 because commands use raw placeholders (CONNECTION_ID, <actionId>) with no concrete worked example of a real action invocation, and above 3 because the guidance is genuinely executable rather than pseudocode.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The setup sequence is clear and includes an explicit validation feedback loop: poll with --wait while state is BUILDING, branch on READY / CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED (with follow-up polling after the user acts) / CONFIGURATION_ERROR via the error field — matching 'Clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. It is below 5 because the document twice says 'skip to **Step 2**' yet no Step 2 exists and section numbering is incoherent (an unnumbered section followed by '1b'), leaving a navigation gap; it is above 3 because checkpoints are explicit, not implicit.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

There are no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ all absent), and the ~140-line body is well-sectioned with headers covering install, auth, connection, action discovery/execution, proxy, and best practices. This fits 'Good structure; most content is appropriately placed; minor organization gaps' — it is above 3 because the self-contained layout is coherent and nothing buries its references, but below 5 because the proxy flag table and the clientAction field reference detail are inline material that a longer skill would move to a one-level-deep reference file.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is correctly structured — third-person, concise, with an explicit 'Use when' clause — and its product-specific framing makes conflict risk negligible. However, its capabilities are generic ('manage data, records, automate workflows') and its trigger vocabulary is limited to the product name itself, with no funnel/landing-page/contact/lead terms that users naturally say.

Suggestions

Replace the generic verbs with concrete operations, e.g. 'Manage ClickFunnels funnels, funnel steps, and pages; work with contacts and contact records; run and automate ClickFunnels workflows' instead of 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows'.

Broaden the trigger clause to include natural user phrasing: 'Use when the user mentions ClickFunnels, sales funnels, funnel pages, or ClickFunnels contacts, leads, and workflows.'

Consider mentioning read vs. write/data-management use cases (e.g. retrieving contacts or funnel data vs. running automation actions) so the 'what' distinguishes the skill's actual coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("ClickFunnels integration") but the stated actions — "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" — are minimal and generic, matching the anchor 'Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic' (cf. 'Processes PDF files'). It is above score 1 because a concrete domain is named, but below score 3 because no specific operations (funnels, contacts, pages, leads) are listed.

2 / 5

Completeness

It has both a 'what' ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") and an explicit 'when' ("Use when the user wants to interact with ClickFunnels data"), matching 'Has both what and when; when could be more explicit or specific'. It is above 3 because the 'when' clause is explicit rather than implied, but below 5 because the 'what' is vague and the 'when' lacks concrete trigger phrases beyond repeating the product name.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"ClickFunnels" is a relevant natural keyword and it appears twice, but all common variations and synonyms users would actually say — funnels, landing pages, contacts, leads, workflows, pipelines — are missing. This fits 'Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms' ('Works with PDF files'); it is above 2 because the one keyword present is exactly what users would say, but below 4 because coverage stops there.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

ClickFunnels is a clear niche with distinct triggers; the description could not plausibly fire for another skill, matching 'Clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk'. The product-specific name gives it distinctiveness that the vague capability verbs cannot erode.

5 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

membranedev/application-skills

Path

skills/clickfunnels-classic/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.