CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

coder

Coder integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Coder data.

56

Quality

65%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/coder/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content delivers strong executable CLI guidance with a clear, validated connection workflow, but carries some padding and minor structural and consistency issues that keep it from fully lean.

Suggestions

Trim the opening overview paragraph explaining what Coder is, since Claude can infer platform basics from the named product and docs link.

Fix the step numbering (add a labeled 'Step 1a' and define the referenced 'Step 2') so the connection workflow sequence is unambiguous.

Standardize on either 'membrane' or 'npx @membranehq/cli@latest' across all command examples to avoid confusion about which invocation to use.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient with concrete commands, but includes unnecessary explanation such as the opening paragraph on what Coder is and padded lines like 'This is the fastest way to get a connection', fitting 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than the leaner level 4.

3 / 5

Actionability

It provides concrete, mostly copy-paste-ready commands (install, login, connection ensure, action run, proxy) with clearly marked placeholders, but has minor gaps such as inconsistent use of 'npx' vs 'membrane' and unresolved CONNECTION_ID substitution, fitting 'mostly executable guidance with minor gaps'.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The install -> authenticate -> connect -> search -> run sequence is clear with explicit state handling and feedback loops (poll until READY, re-authenticate on CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED, check error fields), but numbering is inconsistent ('1b' with no '1a', an undefined 'Step 2'), fitting 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the single SKILL.md is organized with clear section headers covering each capability; at ~140 lines it exceeds the simple-skill threshold, but the structure is good with only minor organization gaps (e.g., the proxy flags table and connection-state reference could be split out), fitting 'good structure; most content appropriately placed'.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description benefits from an explicit 'Use when' trigger and a clearly named platform, but its action list is generic and not tied to Coder's actual capabilities, leaving it competent yet unspecific.

Suggestions

Replace the generic 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' with concrete Coder-specific actions (e.g., 'Create and manage remote development workspaces, run workspace actions, and proxy Coder API requests').

Broaden the trigger phrase to cover natural synonyms users say, such as 'Use when the user wants to manage Coder workspaces, remote dev environments, or run Coder API actions'.

Add file-extension or product-name variations (e.g., 'coder.com', 'workspace templates') to improve trigger-term coverage and distinctiveness.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('Coder integration') and lists actions ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows'), but those actions are generic and abstract rather than concrete Coder-specific capabilities, fitting the 'names domain and 1-2 concrete actions but not comprehensive' anchor rather than the more specific level 4.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both a 'what' ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') and an explicit 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with Coder data') are present, but the 'when' is narrow and could be more specific, fitting the 'has both what and when; when could be more explicit' anchor; the missing-'Use when' cap at 3 does not apply since the clause exists.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'Coder' and 'interact with Coder data' provide a relevant natural keyword and trigger phrase, but common variations or synonyms a user might say (dev environments, workspaces, cloud dev) are missing, matching the 'some relevant keywords but missing common variations' anchor.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The named Coder platform gives a clear, distinct niche with minimal conflict risk, but the broad 'manage data, records, and automate workflows' phrasing introduces minor overlap risk with general data-management skills, placing it at 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk' rather than the fully-distinct level 5.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.