Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete Membrane CLI commands and a well-validated connection workflow, but it pads several sections and leaves destructive actions without validation steps. The inlined 16-row actions table and absence of any reference files limit progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Add a validation/confirmation checkpoint before destructive actions (e.g., "Before delete-asset or delete-scan-profile, run list-assets/list-scan-profiles to confirm the target id, and confirm with the user before running the delete").
Move the Popular actions table into a separate reference file (e.g. references/actions.md) and link to it from a short overview, keeping SKILL.md lean.
Trim motivational padding ("so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing", "This is the fastest way to get a connection") and fix the dangling "skip to Step 2" reference by labeling the post-connection step explicitly.
Add at least one concrete end-to-end worked example with real values (connect -> list-assets -> run an action) to lift actionability from 4 to 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient concrete commands, but includes several padded/motivational lines ("so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing", "This is the fastest way to get a connection", the agent-types tail sentence). It is not 4 because the over-explanation is more than minor, and not 2 because the bulk is tight and command-driven. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands across all common cases (install, login, connection ensure/get --wait, action list/run, request/proxy) plus a full proxy-options table. It is not 5 because every example uses placeholders with no concrete end-to-end worked example tying a real table action (e.g. list-assets) to a real run command. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The connection sub-flow is well-sequenced with state-based validation and a feedback loop (READY/BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/CONFIGURATION_ERROR), but destructive actions (delete-scan-profile, delete-asset, stop-scan) are run via a bare `membrane action run` with no validation checkpoint. Per the rubric, destructive operations without validation cap workflow clarity at 3, and the "skip to Step 2" reference points to a step that is not labeled as such. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headers (##/###/####) give reasonable structure, but there are no bundle files at all and the 16-row Popular actions table is inlined reference content that belongs in a separate file. It is not 2 because the content is sectioned rather than a monolithic wall, and not 4 because no content is split into one-level-deep references. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |