CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

e-goi

E-goi integration. Manage Organizations. Use when the user wants to interact with E-goi data.

62

Quality

74%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/e-goi/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with executable Membrane CLI commands and a well-sequenced, checkpointed connection workflow, losing points only for minor verbosity and the absence of validation guidance around destructive operations.

Suggestions

Trim the introductory paragraph about what E-goi is and the "focus on the integration logic" aside — Claude does not need this context.

Add a verification/retry checkpoint for destructive actions (e.g. confirm a list's contents before delete-list, or verify creation succeeded after create-* actions).

Consider moving the 20-row popular-actions table to a references file and keeping only the most common examples inline.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean executable commands and tables, but includes a few trimmable explanations ("E-goi is a marketing automation platform..." and "so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing").

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides copy-paste-ready commands for install, login, connection setup, action search/run, and proxying, plus a concrete popular-actions table with keys — covering the common cases fully.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connection workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit state-based checkpoints and polling feedback (BUILDING → READY / CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED / CONFIGURATION_ERROR), but destructive actions like delete-list lack validation guidance.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized into clear sections in a single file with no bundle files present, though the 20-row popular-actions table arguably belongs in a separate reference file.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is distinct and includes an explicit use-when clause, but it is thin on concrete capabilities and trigger keywords, naming only "Manage Organizations" rather than the rich contacts/campaigns/forms functionality the body describes.

Suggestions

Replace the generic "Manage Organizations" with concrete capabilities, e.g. "Manage contacts, lists, campaigns, tags, and forms in E-goi".

Expand the trigger clause with natural user phrasing: "Use when the user wants to manage E-goi contacts, email/SMS campaigns, lists, or forms."

Add common keywords/synonyms (email marketing, SMS campaigns, contact lists) so the description matches how users actually ask.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ("E-goi integration") and one action ("Manage Organizations"), but that action is generic and not comprehensive — it omits the contacts, campaigns, and forms coverage actually documented in the body.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both halves are present — a "what" ("E-goi integration. Manage Organizations.") and an explicit "when" ("Use when the user wants to interact with E-goi data"), though the trigger clause is generic rather than concrete.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"E-goi" and "E-goi data" are relevant terms, but the description misses the natural phrases a user would say (email marketing, SMS campaigns, contacts, campaigns) that the body itself surfaces.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"E-goi" is a specific named product with a distinct trigger ("Use when the user wants to interact with E-goi data"), giving it a clear niche and minimal conflict risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.