Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, executable runbook with concrete CLI commands and a genuine connection-state feedback loop. Its weaknesses are minor padding/marketing prose, an inconsistent membrane-vs-npx invocation convention, and a dangling "Step 2" reference that fragments the workflow.
Suggestions
Trim marketing filler (the Google Forms/SurveyMonkey comparison and the "auth plumbing" framing) to lift conciseness toward the lean anchor.
Standardize on one invocation style (either `membrane` or `npx @membranehq/cli@latest`) across the action-search and run sections, and resolve the dangling "Step 2" reference by labeling the next step.
Make action selection actionable by giving a short worked example of translating a user intent into a `--intent` query and reading `inputSchema`/`outputSchema`.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly tight, command-driven prose, but padded lines like "Think of it as a more versatile alternative to Google Forms or SurveyMonkey" and "so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing" add explanation/marketing Claude does not need. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It supplies copy-paste-ready bash commands for install, login, connection, action search/run, and proxy requests with a flag table, but mixes `membrane` and `npx @membranehq/cli@latest` invocation styles and leaves action selection vague ("Use action names and parameters as needed"). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The install→login→connect→poll→search→run sequence is clear and includes a real feedback loop (poll BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED until READY), but the dangling "skip to Step 2" reference with no matching Step 2 header is a minor sequencing gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so this is a single-file skill; section headers (Overview, Authentication, Connecting, Proxy requests, Best practices) are well organized and easy to navigate, but at ~140 lines with no one-level-deep references and some redundancy between the "Searching for actions" and "Popular actions" sections it stops short of the score-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |