CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

hyperext-sage-50

Hyperext: Sage 50 integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Hyperext: Sage 50 data.

54

Quality

61%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/hyperext-sage-50/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with executable commands and a well-checkpointed connection workflow. Its main gaps are an inline reference table that should be split out and the absence of verification steps for destructive record-creation operations.

Suggestions

Add a verification step after create/update actions, e.g. re-fetch the created record with the corresponding get-* action to confirm success.

Move the Popular actions table into a references file (e.g. actions.md) and link to it from a short overview, keeping only a few representative examples inline.

Label the post-connection step explicitly as "Step 2: Search for actions" so the "skip to Step 2" forward reference resolves.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient CLI instruction with little over-explanation, but the 20-row inline Popular actions table is reference material that pads the body and could be tightened or moved.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, copy-paste-ready bash commands throughout (install, login, connection ensure/get with --wait, action list/run with --input, request proxy flags) cover the common cases fully.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connection setup has clear state checkpoints and a polling feedback loop, but destructive create-actions (create-customer, create-sales-invoice) run with no verification step, capping the score per the destructive-operations guidance.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are organized and an external docs link is present, but at 160+ lines with no bundle files, the inline Popular actions table is content that belongs in a separate reference file rather than the overview.

3 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly names a specific niche and includes both a what and a Use-when trigger, satisfying the core completeness bar. Its weakness is generic, non-concrete action language that blunts specificity and trigger-term quality.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs with concrete capabilities, e.g. "List and create customers, invoices, products, and suppliers in Sage 50".

Add natural trigger synonyms users actually say, such as "Sage 50 accounting", "Sage 50 records", or "Sage 50 data".

Tighten the Use-when clause to name concrete objects ("Use when the user wants to query or create Sage 50 customers, invoices, or products").

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain ("Hyperext: Sage 50 integration") but the actions "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" are generic and minimal rather than concrete capabilities.

2 / 5

Completeness

Both a what (integration, manage data/records/workflows) and an explicit when ("Use when the user wants to interact with Hyperext: Sage 50 data") are present, though the trigger is brand-generic rather than concrete.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

"Sage 50" and "interact with Hyperext: Sage 50 data" give some relevant keywords, but common variations and natural user phrasings beyond the brand name are missing.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The Sage 50 niche is specific and largely distinct, but the generic action verbs ("manage data, records, automate workflows") create minor overlap risk with other integration skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.