CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ingenico-group

Ingenico Group integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Ingenico Group data.

60

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Medium

Suggest reviewing before use

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/ingenico-group/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is highly actionable with copy-paste commands and a clear state-machine-driven connection flow, with only minor conciseness padding and a couple of small workflow-sequencing gaps.

Suggestions

Resolve the dangling 'Skip to Step 2' reference by adding an explicit 'Step 2' header or rewording the pointer.

Trim redundant prose such as the repeated action-list command under 'Popular actions' and the auth-plumbing aside.

Add brief error-handling guidance for `membrane action run` and proxy requests (e.g., inspecting the `error` field and retrying).

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean with executable commands throughout, but contains minor padding ('so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing') and a redundant action-list command repeated under 'Popular actions'.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides copy-paste ready commands with a full flag table covering login, connection, action list/run, JSON parameters, and proxy requests across the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The install→login→connect→search→run sequence is clear and the connection state machine has explicit checkpoints with a poll-again feedback loop, but a 'Skip to Step 2' reference has no matching Step 2 header and action/proxy execution lacks error-handling guidance.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The single self-contained file is organized into clear, well-labeled sections with no nested references, though at ~140 lines it exceeds the simple-skill threshold and some state-machine detail could live in a reference file.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description answers both what and when with a distinct proper-noun trigger, but its action list is generic rather than Ingenico-specific and it lacks natural synonyms like payments, terminals, or POS.

Suggestions

Replace generic actions ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') with concrete Ingenico capabilities such as 'process payments, manage terminals, and run transactions'.

Add natural trigger synonyms to the 'Use when' clause, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to process payments, query transactions, or manage Ingenico terminals'.

Keep the third-person voice but tighten the opening so the domain-specific value is immediately clear.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the Ingenico Group domain but the listed actions ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') are generic rather than concrete Ingenico-specific capabilities like payments or terminals.

2 / 5

Completeness

Both a 'what' ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') and an explicit 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with Ingenico Group data') are present, but the 'what' is generic rather than concrete.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The trigger 'Use when the user wants to interact with Ingenico Group data' provides the relevant 'Ingenico Group' keyword but misses common synonyms users would say such as payments, terminals, transactions, or POS.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'Ingenico Group' proper-noun trigger gives it a clear niche, though the generic action phrasing ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') creates minor overlap risk with other integration skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.