Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and highly actionable with concrete CLI commands and a connection-state feedback loop. Its main weaknesses are minor verbosity in the intro and inconsistent step numbering that slightly weakens workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete commands, but includes unnecessary padding such as the marketing-style intro ('used by professionals, students, and anyone who wants to write more clearly') and phrases like 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing'. It is above 2 because the bulk is actionable, not padded throughout. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete, copy-pasteable commands for install, login, connection, action listing/running, and proxy requests, plus a flag table, matching 'mostly executable guidance; concrete code or commands with minor gaps'. It does not reach 5 because examples use generic placeholders rather than real Linguix action ids or inputs. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There is a clear sequence (install, authenticate, connect, search, run, proxy) with validation checkpoints via state polling (READY / CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED / CONFIGURATION_ERROR) and re-poll feedback. It stops at 4 because step numbering is inconsistent ('skip to Step 2' with no labeled Step 1/2) and some checkpoints are implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized into clear sections with no nested external references and no bundle files, matching 'good structure; most content is appropriately placed'. It does not reach 5 because the inlined clientAction details and request-flag table could live in separate reference files for a skill of this length. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |