CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

mezmo

Mezmo integration. Manage Organizations. Use when the user wants to interact with Mezmo data.

57

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/mezmo/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, largely executable CLI guide with a clear connection workflow and state-based checkpoints, held back by some redundant commands and an unnecessary introductory paragraph.

Suggestions

Remove the introductory paragraph explaining what Mezmo is and who uses it, and drop the duplicate `action list` example in "Popular actions".

Fix the dangling "Step 2" reference by numbering the workflow steps explicitly or relinking to the "Searching for actions" section.

Add an explicit verification step after running an action (e.g. check the `output` field for errors) to close the workflow's feedback loop.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly command-driven and efficient, but the introductory paragraph explaining what Mezmo is and who uses it, plus the near-duplicate `action list` command repeated across "Searching for actions" and "Popular actions", are unnecessary padding.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, copy-paste-ready CLI commands cover the common cases (install, login, connect, poll, search, run, proxy), with only minor gaps such as the generic `--input '{"key": "value"}'` placeholder and unfilled CONNECTION_ID/<actionId> tokens.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The install → authenticate → connect → poll-until-ready → search → run sequence is clear with state-based checkpoints (READY, BUILDING, CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED) and a poll-again feedback loop, though the dangling "Step 2" reference and lack of explicit post-run verification are minor gaps.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The single-file body is organized with clear section headers and no nested references, but at ~140 lines the detailed clientAction state reference and proxy flag table are somewhat bulky inline with no external reference file to offload them.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

66%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description answers both what and when and is clearly tied to a distinct named product, but it under-claims the skill's scope and misses the "LogDNA" synonym and common log-related trigger terms.

Suggestions

Expand the "what" to mention logs, alerts, dashboards, and pipelines rather than only "Manage Organizations".

Add "LogDNA" and "log management" as trigger synonyms so users referring to the former name still activate the skill.

Make the "when" clause more specific, e.g. "Use when the user wants to query, search, or manage Mezmo (LogDNA) logs, alerts, or dashboards."

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ("Mezmo integration") and one concrete action ("Manage Organizations"), but coverage is not comprehensive — the body covers Logs, Alerts, Dashboards, Projects, and Pipelines, none of which the description mentions.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both a "what" ("Mezmo integration. Manage Organizations.") and an explicit "when" ("Use when the user wants to interact with Mezmo data.") are present, though the "when" clause is generic and the "what" is narrow.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The trigger phrase "Use when the user wants to interact with Mezmo data" surfaces the keyword "Mezmo", but it omits the former product name "LogDNA" and natural terms like "logs" or "log management" that users would say.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Naming the specific SaaS product "Mezmo" gives it a clear niche with a distinct trigger and minimal risk of firing for an unrelated skill.

5 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.