CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

noticeable

Noticeable integration. Manage Organizations. Use when the user wants to interact with Noticeable data.

61

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/noticeable/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with executable Membrane CLI commands and a clearly sequenced connection workflow including state-based polling checkpoints. It is held back only by minor conciseness padding and a couple of small structural/labeling gaps.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly lean and command-focused, with only minor over-explanation (the Noticeable intro paragraph and the thin 'Noticeable Overview' section) that could be trimmed, fitting 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' rather than the fully lean 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides copy-paste-ready, fully executable commands for the common cases (install, login, connection ensure, action list/run, request proxy) with concrete flags and a parameter table, matching the 'fully executable; copy-paste ready' anchor.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear install→authenticate→connect→poll→search→run sequence exists with state-based checkpoints (READY/BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED) and a polling feedback loop, but the referenced 'Step 2' is unlabeled and action-run error recovery is implicit, so it stops short of the explicit-checklist 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist and the content is a single well-sectioned file; structure is good with clear headings and minor organization gaps (the placeholder-like 'Noticeable Overview' section), fitting 'good structure; most content appropriately placed' rather than a reference-split 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is product-specific and correctly pairs a 'what' with an explicit 'Use when' trigger, but the capability statement is thin (a single action) and keyword coverage lacks synonyms. It is solid but not exemplary.

Suggestions

Replace the vague 'Noticeable integration' with 2-3 concrete capabilities (e.g., 'Collect and manage user feedback, manage Organizations and Notebooks, search and run Noticeable actions') to lift specificity.

Add natural synonyms and entity variations users might say (e.g., 'feedback', 'roadmap input', 'user suggestions') alongside 'Noticeable' and 'Organizations' to broaden trigger coverage.

Tie the 'Use when' clause to concrete triggers (e.g., 'Use when the user wants to collect feedback, manage Organizations, or interact with Noticeable data') to reach a fully explicit what-and-when pairing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ("Noticeable integration") and one concrete action ("Manage Organizations"), but coverage is minimal and not comprehensive, fitting the '1-2 concrete actions' anchor rather than the several-action anchors above.

3 / 5

Completeness

Provides both a 'what' ("Noticeable integration. Manage Organizations.") and an explicit 'when' ("Use when the user wants to interact with Noticeable data."), but the 'what' is thin so it does not reach the concrete-trigger-phrase level of a 5.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes the product name "Noticeable" and the entity "Organizations" plus the natural phrase "interact with Noticeable data", but misses common variations or synonyms, landing on 'some relevant keywords' rather than broad coverage.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The product-specific name "Noticeable" gives it a clear niche with minimal conflict risk, though the generic entity term "Organizations" creates minor overlap with unrelated skills, keeping it just below a 5.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.