Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content provides concrete, mostly copy-paste-ready membrane CLI commands and a well-sequenced connection lifecycle workflow with polling checkpoints. Its main weaknesses are a duplicated action-discovery section and light conceptual padding in the introduction.
Suggestions
Merge the 'Searching for actions' and 'Popular actions' sections to remove the duplicated discovery command.
Trim the opening paragraph that explains what OpenGraph.io is, since Claude already knows the service's purpose.
Show one concrete resolved example (e.g. a real connectionId and actionId) to push actionability from mostly to fully executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with concrete commands, but the discovery command is duplicated (Searching for actions vs Popular actions) and the intro paragraph restates what OpenGraph.io is, so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable membrane/npx commands with flags and --json appear throughout, plus a flag table for proxy requests; only minor gaps like unsubstituted placeholders keep it just below fully copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence (install, auth, connection ensure, poll until READY, search, run) with polling-based checkpoints and a feedback loop for CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED; minor disjointedness from the redundant Popular actions section. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned single-file skill with clear headers and an external docs link; no bundle files are needed at this length, with only minor organization gaps from the repeated discovery section. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |