CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

pushsafer

Pushsafer integration. Manage Devices. Use when the user wants to interact with Pushsafer data.

60

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/pushsafer/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a lean, highly actionable guide to driving Pushsafer via the Membrane CLI, with concrete commands and a well-sequenced connection workflow including validation/feedback loops. Main weaknesses are a few trimmable explanatory phrases and inconsistent step labeling.

Suggestions

Label the referenced 'Step 2' explicitly (e.g., add a '## Step 2: Discover and run actions' header) so the 'skip to Step 2' navigation resolves.

Trim softening phrases like 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing' that restate what the commands already show.

Fill out the near-empty 'Pushsafer Overview' section (currently only '- **Push Notification**') or remove it so it does not read as a stub.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with executable commands and tight prose; only minor over-explanation such as 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing' that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready, fully executable commands throughout (login, connection ensure, action list/run, request proxy) with concrete flags and JSON output examples covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence from install through connect-to-run with validation checkpoints (polling for READY, handling CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED and CONFIGURATION_ERROR), but the 'skip to Step 2' reference to an unlabeled step and the '1b' subsection introduce a minor labeling gap.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into clear sections with all content appropriately placed inline; no bundle files are present and no external references are needed, though the ~135-line body is slightly above the simple-skill threshold for a top score.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description correctly includes both a 'what' and an explicit 'Use when...' trigger and names a distinct service, but its capability list is thin and the trigger phrasing is generic rather than enumerating concrete Pushsafer use cases.

Suggestions

Replace 'Manage Devices' with a list of concrete actions (e.g., 'send push notifications, manage devices and groups, view delivery status').

Make the 'when' clause more specific by naming natural user phrases (e.g., 'Use when the user wants to send or manage Pushsafer push notifications, devices, or message delivery').

Add common synonyms/keywords users say (e.g., 'push notifications', 'alerts', 'device groups') to strengthen trigger term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('Pushsafer integration') but the only action is the minimal/generic 'Manage Devices', comparable to 'Processes PDF files' rather than a list of concrete actions.

2 / 5

Completeness

Both 'what' (Pushsafer integration, manage devices) and an explicit 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with Pushsafer data') are present, though the trigger could be more specific.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes the natural service name 'Pushsafer' and the phrase 'interact with Pushsafer data', but lacks synonyms or common variations users might say.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The named service 'Pushsafer' gives it a clear niche with low conflict risk, though the generic 'Manage Devices'/'interact with data' phrasing leaves minor overlap risk.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.