CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

small-improvements

Small Improvements integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Small Improvements data.

52

Quality

59%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/small-improvements/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body delivers executable Membrane CLI guidance with a well-structured connection workflow, but it is held back by a padded intro, missing validation for destructive data actions, and orphaned step numbering that disrupts the sequence.

Suggestions

Trim the introductory paragraph about what Small Improvements is and the auth-plumbing commentary; assume Claude knows general background.

Add a validation/verification step before destructive actions (e.g. 'Get Objective' to confirm before 'Delete Objective', or confirm with the user).

Fix the orphaned numbering — define Step 1a/1b/Step 2 or renumber the connection flow consistently so 'skip to Step 2' resolves.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient with concrete commands, but the intro paragraph explaining what Small Improvements is and phrases like 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing' are unnecessary padding Claude does not need.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready CLI commands with explicit flags and placeholders (login, connection ensure, action run, request), with only minor gaps such as the Overview listing action names without their parameters.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connection sub-flow has clear state checkpoints and a poll-then-retry feedback loop, but destructive operations like 'Delete Objective' lack validation/verification steps, capping the score at 3; orphaned 'Step 2' and '1b' references also break the sequence.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is organized into well-labeled sections (Install, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Running actions, Proxy, Best practices) with no nested references; minor organization gaps from the broken Step 2 / 1b numbering.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description answers both what and when and is anchored to a specific product, but its action list is generic and it omits the natural task keywords (reviews, feedback, goals) that would sharpen triggers and specificity.

Suggestions

Replace generic actions ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') with concrete ones from the body, e.g. 'Create and track objectives, give praise, and request feedback'.

Add natural trigger terms users say, e.g. 'Use when the user mentions performance reviews, feedback, objectives/goals, or praise in Small Improvements'.

Keep the product-scoped trigger but tighten the when-clause to specific Small Improvements tasks rather than 'interact with data'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('Small Improvements integration') but the actions are generic and minimal — 'Manage data, records, and automate workflows' lacks concrete operations; closer to 'Processes PDF files' than to a list of specific actions.

2 / 5

Completeness

States both what ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows') and an explicit when ('Use when the user wants to interact with Small Improvements data'), though the when-clause is generic rather than listing concrete triggers.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes the natural product name 'Small Improvements' as the key trigger, but misses the common task terms users would actually say (performance reviews, feedback, goals, praise) that the body itself enumerates.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Tied to a named product ('Small Improvements') giving it a clear niche and low conflict risk, but the generic 'interact with ... data' phrasing leaves minor overlap with other data-integration skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.