Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete, runnable CLI commands and a clear connection-state workflow featuring real validation checkpoints. It is held back by repeated command examples, a marketing-style intro, a dangling 'Step 2' reference, and inlined reference detail that could be split out.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the `membrane action list --intent=QUERY` command — keep it in one section and reference that section elsewhere to tighten conciseness.
Fix the dangling 'skip to Step 2' reference by labeling the workflow steps explicitly (e.g., 'Step 1: Connect', 'Step 2: Discover & run actions').
Add a concrete Survicate example (a real actionId and a sample intent such as 'list survey responses') so the actionability guidance is fully copy-paste ready rather than placeholder-only.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient, but the marketing-style intro about what Survicate is repeats knowledge Claude already has, and the `membrane action list --intent=QUERY` command is repeated across three sections. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete copy-paste CLI commands throughout (install, login, connection ensure, action run, request) plus a proxy flags table; placeholders like `<actionId>` and `QUERY` are never filled with a concrete Survicate example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear connection-setup sequence with an explicit state-polling feedback loop, but 'skip to Step 2' references a non-existent labeled step and destructive proxy verbs lack pre-flight validation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with no nested or dangling references, but dense reference material (the clientAction schema and proxy-flags table) is inlined rather than split into a separate reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |