CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

tacklit

Tacklit integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Tacklit data.

61

Quality

72%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/tacklit/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable, built from executable CLI commands and a well-defined connection state machine with re-polling feedback, and is reasonably concise and well-sectioned. Its main weaknesses are a dangling "Step 2" reference with inconsistent step numbering and a small amount of introductory padding.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly command-focused and efficient, with only minor over-explanation such as "Tacklit is a project management and team collaboration platform..." and "so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing", fitting the efficient-with-minor-trimmable-instances anchor rather than the lean anchor 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

It provides copy-paste-ready, fully executable commands throughout (npm install, membrane login, connection ensure/get with --wait, action list/run, request) plus a flags table, covering the common cases exactly as the top anchor requires.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connection flow has an explicit state machine (READY/BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/CONFIGURATION_ERROR) with a re-poll feedback loop, but it references a "Step 2" that has no corresponding heading and uses a lone "1b" subheading, leaving minor structural gaps that fit the clear-sequence-with-minor-gaps anchor rather than anchor 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is organized into clearly labeled sections (Overview, Install, Authentication, Connecting, Searching, Proxy, Best practices) with no nested references and no bundle files present, giving good structure with minor organization gaps (the thin, partially redundant "Popular actions" section) rather than the idealized one-level-deep reference layout of anchor 5.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description correctly pairs a what-statement with an explicit Use-when trigger and is anchored by a distinctive proper noun, but its actions and triggers stay generic instead of naming the concrete Tacklit objects (tasks, projects, checklists, teams) that would sharpen both specificity and trigger quality.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs with concrete Tacklit actions, e.g. "Create and manage tasks, projects, checklists, and teams; automate workflows."

Expand the trigger clause to mirror user language, e.g. "Use when the user wants to manage Tacklit tasks, projects, checklists, or team collaboration."

Add the file/record types users actually reference (tasks, projects, teams) so the trigger covers natural synonyms.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Manage data, records, and automate workflows" names the Tacklit domain plus a few actions, but the verbs (manage, automate) are generic rather than concrete like 'extract' or 'fill forms', matching the anchor that names the domain with 1-2 actions but is not comprehensive.

3 / 5

Completeness

It supplies both a "what" ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") and an explicit "when" ("Use when the user wants to interact with Tacklit data"), but the when-clause is generic rather than concrete trigger phrases, matching the anchor where both are present yet the when could be more specific.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The sole trigger clause is "Use when the user wants to interact with Tacklit data", which surfaces the keyword "Tacklit" but misses natural task-level variations (tasks, projects, checklists, teams) that the body itself documents, fitting the anchor with some relevant keywords but missing common synonyms.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The repeated proper noun "Tacklit" gives the skill a clear niche and low conflict risk, but the generic verbs (manage data, interact with data) leave minor overlap with other data-integration skills, matching the mostly-distinct anchor rather than the fully-distinct anchor 5.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.