Name: thoughtly
Rating: 55.2 (1 reviews)
Author: membranedev

thoughtly

Thoughtly integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Thoughtly data.

Quality

62%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/thoughtly/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body delivers strong, executable Membrane CLI guidance with a genuine connection-state validation loop. Its main flaws are an embedded AI apology paragraph and an empty placeholder Overview section that add noise, plus inconsistent step numbering.

Suggestions

Delete the "Official docs: I am sorry, I cannot provide an API..." line — it is an AI artifact that contradicts the proxy/API guidance that follows.

Remove or fill the empty "Thoughtly Overview" section (the Note/Content/Notebook bullets and "Use action names and parameters as needed" placeholder).

Make the connection flow a single numbered checklist (1. Install, 2. Authenticate, 3. Connect, 4. Wait for READY, 5. Discover actions, 6. Run) instead of scattered sections with broken Step references.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is mostly lean executable CLI commands, but it carries several padded sections — the embedded AI apology ("I am sorry, I cannot provide an API...") and the empty "Thoughtly Overview" with placeholder bullets — that should be trimmed, fitting the mostly-efficient-but-could-be-tightened anchor; not a 4 because the apology and empty overview are more than minor.	3 / 5
Actionability	It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands for the full flow (install, login, connection ensure, action list, action run, request) covering common cases, matching the mostly-executable anchor; not a 5 because the Overview section's "Use action names and parameters as needed" is non-actionable filler.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The connect step has an explicit feedback loop — poll with --wait, branch on READY/BUILDING/CLIENT_ACTION_REQUIRED/CONFIGURATION_ERROR, re-poll after the user acts — matching the clear-sequence-with-most-checkpoints anchor; not a 5 because step numbering is inconsistent (a referenced "Step 2" with no labeled Step 1, and a "1b") and the overall flow is scattered across sections rather than a single checklist.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Content is organized into clear, navigable sections (Overview, Working with Thoughtly, Install, Auth, Connecting, Searching, Popular actions, Proxy, Best practices) with no nested references, matching the good-structure anchor; not a 5 because it is a single ~140-line monolith where some content (the proxy flag table, best practices) is inlined rather than split, and it exceeds the simple under-50-line exception.	4 / 5
	Total	15 / 20 Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description answers both what and when with an explicit Use-when clause tied to a named app, giving it solid completeness and distinctiveness. Its weakness is generic, non-concrete action language and thin trigger-term coverage beyond the app name.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs with concrete actions, e.g. "Create and search notes, manage notebooks, and automate record workflows in Thoughtly."

Expand trigger terms beyond "Thoughtly data" to include natural phrases like notes, notebooks, records, or knowledge base.

Tighten the when-clause to name the specific tasks (e.g. "Use when the user wants to create, find, or update Thoughtly notes and records").

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	It names the domain (Thoughtly) but the actions — "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" — are generic rather than concrete, matching the anchor where the domain is named but actions are minimal or generic; it is not a 3 because none of the actions are as specific as "extracts content".	2 / 5
Completeness	Both halves are present: a "what" ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") and an explicit "when" ("Use when the user wants to interact with Thoughtly data"), matching the anchor where both exist but the when could be more specific; not a 5 because the what is generic rather than concrete trigger phrases.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	The clause "Use when the user wants to interact with Thoughtly data" supplies a relevant trigger anchored on the app name, but coverage is limited to "Thoughtly data" and misses natural synonyms like notes, records, or knowledge base, fitting the anchor for some relevant keywords missing common variations.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Naming the specific app Thoughtly gives it a clear niche with low conflict risk, matching the mostly-distinct anchor; not a 5 because the generic actions (manage data, records) could still overlap with other data-management skills.	4 / 5
	Total	13 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: membranedev/application-skills
Path: skills/thoughtly/SKILL.md
Commit: f484c82

Reviewed: 4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.