Name: verdict-as-a-service
Rating: 59.2 (1 reviews)
Author: membranedev

verdict-as-a-service

Verdict as a Service integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with Verdict as a Service data.

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/verdict-as-a-service/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is an efficient, executable CLI integration guide with a well-sequenced connection workflow that includes validation and feedback loops. It sits just below top marks due to a thin 'Popular actions' section and inconsistent step numbering.

Suggestions

Replace the 'Popular actions' section's generic discovery command with a short list of named, commonly-used Vaas actions so Claude has a concrete starting point.

Fix the step numbering (define 'Step 1'/'Step 2' or relabel '1b') so cross-references like 'skip to Step 2' resolve unambiguously.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is largely lean and command-driven, with only minor over-explanation such as 'so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing' and the opening overview paragraph that could be trimmed.	4 / 5
Actionability	It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands throughout (login, connection ensure, polling, action list/run, request proxy) with a flags table, but the 'Popular actions' section only repeats the discovery command instead of naming actual popular actions.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	The connection flow is a clear sequence with state-based validation and explicit feedback loops (poll until READY, re-poll after user action, error-field handling), but step numbering is inconsistent ('Step 2' is referenced yet undefined, '1b' appears with no '1a').	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Content is well-organized into clearly headed sections with commands appropriately inline for a CLI skill and easy navigation; there are no separate reference files, and the 'Popular actions' section is thin, leaving minor organization gaps.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly names the product and provides an explicit 'Use when' trigger, giving it solid completeness and distinctiveness. Specificity and trigger-term quality are moderate because the listed actions are generic verbs and keyword coverage lacks synonyms.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs ('manage', 'automate') with concrete actions the skill performs, e.g. 'search, upload, and analyze records' or specific Vaas operations.

Add natural trigger synonyms users might say, such as 'risk scoring', 'fraud checks', or 'loan decisions', alongside 'Verdict as a Service data'.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	It names the domain and a few actions ('Manage data, records, and automate workflows'), but the verbs are generic ('manage', 'automate') rather than concrete, listing 1-2 domain actions without comprehensive coverage.	3 / 5
Completeness	Both 'what' ('Verdict as a Service integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows.') and an explicit 'when' ('Use when the user wants to interact with Verdict as a Service data.') are present, though the 'what' is somewhat generic.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	The product name 'Verdict as a Service' is a natural keyword, and 'data', 'records', 'workflows' appear, but there are no common synonyms or variations and the remaining terms are generic.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The named product 'Verdict as a Service' gives a clear niche and distinct trigger, but the generic 'manage data, records, automate workflows' phrasing creates minor overlap risk with related data-skills.	4 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: membranedev/application-skills
Path: skills/verdict-as-a-service/SKILL.md
Commit: f484c82

Reviewed: 3 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.