Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is actionable and concise, with executable Membrane CLI commands throughout. Its main weaknesses are an inconsistent workflow numbering scheme, missing validation for write/proxy operations, and no progressive disclosure into reference files.
Suggestions
Fix the step numbering: label the connection steps consistently (e.g. '1. Ensure connection', '2. Wait for ready') and ensure every 'Step N' reference resolves.
Add an explicit validation/checkpoint after write operations (e.g. re-fetch a session/report after `membrane action run` or a POST/PATCH proxy call to confirm the result).
Extract the proxy flag table and action-discovery details into a reference file (e.g. REFERENCE.md) and link to it from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and mostly assumes Claude's competence, with only minor over-explanation such as the introductory paragraph listing industries Veriff serves. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands for install, auth, connection, action discovery, and proxying, with minor gaps where action IDs and connection IDs remain placeholders. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A sequence and a connection-state polling loop exist, but the step numbering is inconsistent ('Step 2' referenced while a step is labeled '1b', with no '1a'/'Step 1') and write/proxy operations lack explicit result validation. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Section headers give structure, but with no bundle files the API/action-discovery and proxy-reference material is inlined in a single ~140-line doc rather than split into one-level-deep reference files. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |