CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

whatcounts

WhatCounts integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with WhatCounts data.

52

Quality

59%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/whatcounts/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, actionable CLI integration guide with strong command examples and connection-state feedback loops, weakened mainly by some prose padding and the lack of a validation checkpoint before destructive action runs.

Suggestions

Trim explanatory fluff (the WhatCounts marketing overview and "auth plumbing" framing) to tighten token use.

Add an explicit validation/verification step before running destructive or batch actions (e.g. dry-run, confirm intent, or check the action's outputSchema first).

Resolve the inconsistent step references (the text mentions "Step 2" but sections are not numbered) and either remove the bare entity bullet list or make it actionable.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Most of the body is efficient CLI guidance, but padded prose such as "helping marketers reach their target audiences effectively" and "so you can focus on the integration logic rather than auth plumbing" could be trimmed.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, copy-paste-ready `membrane` commands cover connecting, polling, searching, running, and proxying, with a flag table; minor gaps are the non-actionable entity overview list and the absence of a complete worked end-to-end example.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The connect→poll→search→run sequence has explicit state feedback loops for connection setup, but there is no validation/verification checkpoint before potentially destructive action runs (sending campaigns, deleting records), which caps the score per the destructive/batch rule.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist; the single >50-line SKILL.md is well-sectioned with clear headings and a table, but the inlined entity overview dump and inconsistent "Step 2" references leave minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description answers both what and when with an explicit Use-when clause and a distinct product name, but its capability list is generic rather than concrete and it omits natural task-based trigger terms.

Suggestions

Replace generic verbs with concrete WhatCounts actions, e.g. "Manage email lists, subscribers, templates, campaigns, and reports".

Broaden trigger terms to cover natural phrasings, e.g. "Use when the user wants to manage email campaigns, lists, or subscribers in WhatCounts".

Tighten the when clause to mention the specific tasks (campaigns, segmentation, reporting) rather than only "interact with WhatCounts data".

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Phrases like "Manage data, records, and automate workflows" name the WhatCounts domain but use generic verbs rather than concrete, domain-specific actions (no mention of campaigns, lists, subscribers, or templates).

2 / 5

Completeness

It states both a "what" ("Manage data, records, and automate workflows") and an explicit "when" ("Use when the user wants to interact with WhatCounts data"), though the when clause is somewhat narrow.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The description relies on the product keyword "WhatCounts" and "interact with WhatCounts data", but lacks natural task-based trigger phrases or synonyms a user would say (e.g. email campaigns, lists, subscribers).

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The proper noun "WhatCounts" gives it a clear niche with minimal conflict risk, but the generic "data, records, workflows" framing leaves minor overlap with other data-integration skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
membranedev/application-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.