Diagnose where your growth is actually leaking (acquisition, activation, retention, or loops) and produce a growth plan with a named loop, an activation definition, a 90-day experiment portfolio and channel guardrails. Use it when someone says growth stalled, signups don't activate, retention is flat, how do we build a growth loop, should we go PLG, onboarding redesign, churn, referral program, or which channel should we bet on. Draws on 672 insights from 143 Lenny's Podcast guests, led by Elena Verna, Casey Winters and Lauryn Isford.
75
94%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting

Turn 'we need more growth' into a diagnosed leak, one named loop, an activation metric and a 90-day plan. Built from 672 insights from 143 Lenny's Podcast guests. Lead team: Elena Verna, Casey Winters, Lauryn Isford.
If the user attached a funnel export, cohort CSV, onboarding screens, or a growth deck, read it first and ask only what is still missing. Max 4 questions:
pmf-check (Verna, Ellis, Winters all say growth amplifies PMF, it cannot create it). Pre-PMF with fewer than a few hundred users routes to manual work, not a growth team (Alströmer, Caldwell).State your inferred answers back in one line before proceeding.
| If… (situation) | Use | From | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| You cannot say which of acquisition, activation or retention is the biggest lever | Growth accounting + instrumented funnel (Play 1) | Naomi Gleit, Jason Cohen | Facebook found churn and resurrection lines dwarfed new users; Cohen's churn ceiling shows why growth stalls mechanically |
| Signups are healthy, few users reach value | Derive activation metric, then rebuild first run (Play 2) | Hila Qu, Sean Ellis, Lauryn Isford, Ben Williams | Onboarding is the choke point upstream of conversion; early-stage gains of 2-4x are common |
| Cohorts decay, churn is the story | Early-lifecycle + tactical retention (Play 3) | Sarah Tavel, Dan Hockenmaier, Patrick Campbell, Jackson Shuttleworth | Most cancellation is early; tactical fixes are cheap and neglected |
| Retention is decent but acquisition is paid, flat or concentrated | Name and instrument a growth loop (Play 4) | Elena Verna, Shishir Mehrotra, Casey Winters, Julian Shapiro | Funnels end at acquisition; loops compound and are owned |
| B2B product with individual entry and enterprise upside | PLG fit test + product-led sales (Play 5) | Hila Qu, Elena Verna, Carilu Dietrich | PLG volume plus a human layer for large accounts |
| Brand-new AI category with many fast competitors | Reinvention over optimization, wow moment, giveaways as marketing (Play 6) | Elena Verna (4.0), Amol Avasare | Perishable opportunity; activation lives in the agent |
| Pre-PMF, handful of users | Kindle strategies and concierge onboarding (see references) | Casey Winters, Rahul Vohra, Gustaf Alströmer | Do unscalable work; only build loops that unlock a fire strategy |
| Considering a hot new channel or influencer program | Channel guardrails and three-ingredient test (Play 4, step 7) | Adam Grenier, Yuriy Timen, Grant Lee | Define pass/fail before spending |
# Growth Plan: <product>, <date>
## 1. Diagnosis
- Stage / motion: <pre-PMF | post-PMF | scaling>, <B2B|B2C>, <single|multi-player>
- Retention curve: <plateaus at X% | no plateau> (if no plateau: stop, fix product)
- Growth accounting (per week): new <n> − stale <n> + resurrected <n> = <net>
- Churn ceiling: <new/month> ÷ <churn> = <max customers>
- Biggest lever: <acquisition | activation | retention | expansion> because <number>
## 2. Activation
- Definition: <behavior, threshold, window> Evidence: <correlation with conversion and retention>
- Current rate: <x%> Target: <y%> Owner: <name>
- First-run changes: <3 bullets from Play 2>
## 3. Loop
- Primary loop (named): <action → reaction → action> Metric per edge: <...>
- Entry-point activation: teammate <x%> | publish <x%> | cold <x%>
- Second loop to start by <date>: <...>
## 4. Channels
| Channel | Share of new users | Test guardrails (impressions / angles / CTR) | Decision date |
- Organic share target: <40-50%> Paid cap: <50%> Payback guardrail: <months>
## 5. 90-day experiment portfolio
| # | Hypothesis | Lever | Size (big swing / small) | Metric | Kill criteria |
(aim for about 10 per sprint batch; keep a backlog of 100 hypotheses)
## 6. Org and ownership
- Growth team staffing, DRI for activation, marketing-to-product handoff owner
## Next 3 actions
1. <this week: instrument or pull cohort data>
2. <this sprint: ship the first activation experiment>
3. <this quarter: stand up the loop and review at day 90>Score each 1-5 (1 / 3 / 5 anchors), total /40.
| Criterion | 1 | 3 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retention precedes acquisition (Verna, Ellis) | Spending on traffic with no cohort plateau | Plateau known, not acted on | Cohorts plateau and improve cohort over cohort (J. Miller) |
| Leak diagnosis (Gleit) | Anecdote or vanity totals | Funnel with step drop-offs | Growth accounting plus per-screen, per-country drop-off |
| Activation definition (Qu, Isford, Ellis) | Signed up or logged in | Behavior chosen by gut | Threshold plus window, correlated with retention, tested causally |
| Onboarding design (Isford, Udezue, Belsky) | Feature tour, names features | Some personalization | One-egg first run, profile questions used, route by role |
| Loop specificity (Verna, Mehrotra) | Funnel only | Loop described, not measured | Named loop, edge metrics, entry points split |
| Channel discipline (Timen, Rajaram, Lee) | One channel, no guardrails | Several channels, vague tests | Pass/fail guardrails, organic 40-50%, paid under 50% |
| Retention levers (Tavel, Campbell, Hockenmaier) | Email nudges | Cohort charts, generic fixes | Early-lifecycle fix, tactical churn recovery, habit loop |
| Ownership and portfolio (Qu, Miller, Deb Liu) | One person, no resources | Team exists, no batch plan | Dedicated team, DRI per surface, big and small bets |
| Output: score per criterion, total, then top 3 fixes, each naming the guest and framework behind it. |
references/frameworks.md — every framework in this skill, how to run itreferences/quotes.md — verified quotes with timestampspmf-check — hand off first when the retention curve does not plateau.experiment — hand off to design and read out the tests this plan queues.metrics — hand off for the north star and metric tree once the activation definition is set.price — hand off when the free/paid fence or expansion packaging is the bottleneck.position — hand off when users do not understand who the product is for at the front door.menkesu/awesome-pm-skills
c1b6e2d
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.