Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-structured for a simple single-purpose skill, with a clear unambiguous action. The main gap is actionability: it specifies the tool and field schema but gives no concrete example payload and does not name the script file the tool runs.
Suggestions
Add a concrete example of the data JSON string, e.g. `{"line1":"...","line2":"...","line3":"...","topic":"ocean"}`, so the invocation is copy-paste ready.
Explicitly state which file run_js should execute (scripts/index.html) so Claude does not have to infer the entry point.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padded explanations of what a haiku is; the (5-7-5) aside is a tight spec and every line (examples, tool, fields) earns its place, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It names the exact tool and the exact data fields with types, but provides no concrete example JSON payload and never references the script file (scripts/index.html) that run_js must execute, leaving key details missing per the incomplete-guidance anchor rather than the copy-paste-ready anchor of 3. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-task skill whose single action (call run_js with line1/line2/line3/topic) is unambiguous, so per the simple-skills note workflow clarity scores 3 without needing multi-step checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with clearly organized Examples and Instructions sections; the bundle files are runtime assets consumed by run_js rather than reference docs Claude must navigate, so the simple-skills allowance for well-organized short skills applies. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |