comparison-base
Internal reusable workflow for resolving the correct Git comparison base for branch reviews and change analysis. Finds the PR target or canonical Fluid Framework upstream, selects the newest shared target-history commit, and detects substantial divergence.
60
75%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/comparison-base/SKILL.mdW011: Third-party content exposure detected (indirect prompt injection risk).
What this means
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Why it was flagged
The workflow queries GitHub pull requests and commit-to-PR metadata based on branch names and commit OIDs, which can ingest outsider-authored PR metadata and commit comments.
- Repository
- microsoft/FluidFramework
- Commit
e41dc04
- Audited
- Security analysis
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.