Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, executable workflow: clearly numbered steps, per-language commands, hard validation gates on tests and CI, and explicit error-recovery loops. Weaknesses are minor — a commandless type-checking step, an abstract demo-link step, and a little promotional padding.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is command-first and lean, but contains minor trimmable content: the twice-repeated "merely a way to get a fresh pair of eyes on the code" asides and the promotional "Share Nori with your team" link in the PR template. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable guidance throughout — per-language detection and fix commands (jq over package.json, cargo clippy, ruff, golangci-lint), a complete gh pr create template, and a CI retry loop. Gaps: step 5 (type checking) provides no commands at all, and step 12's localhost demo instruction is abstract. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 12-step workflow with explicit validation gates: a hard stop on test failures ("Cannot proceed until tests pass"), a CI feedback loop with retry (sleep 60 && gh pr checks), conflict recovery routing back to the merge step, a main-branch safety check, and an upfront TodoWrite checklist. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-organized SKILL.md with no nested references or buried paths, and the inline per-language command matrices are compact enough to justify staying in the main file. Slightly below the top anchor: no section headers, and at ~110 lines the language-specific command blocks could plausibly live in reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |