Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured skill body: every step is executable, risky operations are gated behind explicit validation and user confirmation, and convention details are properly delegated to the fluid-pr-guide skill. The only improvement is removing the duplicated origin-check/test-exception explanation between the <required> steps and the later section.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the origin/microsoft-FluidFramework check: state the full rule (including the test/ pipeline exception) once and have the second mention simply reference 'step 2 checks', saving several lines.
Trim meta-commentary such as 'This is the only point where the fluid-pr flow asks the user a question' unless it is needed to prevent an agent from asking questions elsewhere.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (no git/gh tutorials), but the origin/microsoft-FluidFramework check and the test/ exception are explained twice — once in the <required> steps and again in the 'Pushing and Creating the PR' section — which could be trimmed. That minor duplication places it at anchor 4 rather than 5; it is well above anchor 3 since nearly every token is operational. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: 'git remote get-url origin', 'git push -u origin <feature-branch>', complete 'gh pr create' invocations with heredoc bodies for both the regular and --draft variants, a temp-file recipe for the no-API-permissions case, and the exact message to tell the user. The AskUserQuestion options are spelled out verbatim — a clear anchor 5 match. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered 6-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (protected-branch check, fork-remote check), a hard confirmation gate ('Do NOT run gh pr create until the user has explicitly confirmed via AskUserQuestion'), and a feedback loop (Edit returns to step 5). The push/PR-create operations — the risky ones here — are gated behind validation, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is short (~65 lines), well-sectioned, and delegates the title conventions, body template, and section guidance to the separately-loaded 'fluid-pr-guide' skill — a clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference that keeps this file a workflow overview. Per the rubric's simple-skill guidance, well-organized sections with no unnecessary inline bulk earn the top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |