CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

policy-check

This skill should be used when the user asks to "run policy check", "check policy", "policy-check", or needs to validate package compliance. Provides guidance on running policy checks for specific packages or the entire repository.

76

Quality

95%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a model of a lean, simple skill: it gives an exact executable command, the correct working directory, a scope variant, and a concise rationale, with no unnecessary explanation. Nothing is missing for a read-only compliance check of this kind.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Two lean sentences with concrete commands and a justified rationale for the repo-wide check; no padding and no concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

Gives the fully executable command `pnpm policy-check --path <relative-path>` with where to run it (repo root), the scope variant (`pnpm policy-check` without `--path`), and an explicit anti-pattern callout (do NOT cd into the package).

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

As a simple single-purpose skill, the single action (run policy-check) is unambiguous, with clear scope guidance and a rationale; it is a read-only compliance check, so no validation checkpoint is required and the cap-at-2 rule does not apply.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A self-contained skill under 50 lines with no external references needed (no bundle files exist); the body is well-organized and complete on its own, satisfying the simple-skill allowance.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

90%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it states the skill's purpose, gives an explicit use-when trigger clause, and lists several natural trigger terms a user would actually say. The only weakness is that specificity is moderate — it names the domain and scope variations rather than enumerating multiple distinct concrete actions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (policy checks) and a couple of actions (running checks for a specific package vs the entire repository, validating compliance), but does not list multiple distinct concrete actions — essentially one operation at two scopes.

2 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ("Provides guidance on running policy checks...") and when, with an explicit "This skill should be used when the user asks to..." trigger clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Provides several natural phrasings a user would actually say — "run policy check", "check policy", "policy-check", and "validate package compliance" — giving good coverage of variations.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear, distinct niche (package policy compliance) with specific trigger phrasings, making it unlikely to fire for the wrong skill.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
microsoft/FluidFramework
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.