Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, mostly lean workflow with an explicit verification step, but it has redundancy between its mistake/red-flag sections and presents the key dispatch step as non-executable pseudocode.
Suggestions
Consolidate the overlapping 'Common Mistakes' and 'Red Flags' sections to remove the duplicated guidance on context, verification, and trivial changes.
Replace the 'Task(subagent_type: nori-change-documenter)' pseudocode in the bash block with the actual Task tool invocation syntax, or clearly label it as a tool call rather than a shell command.
Include a complete example subagent prompt to make the dispatch step fully actionable and copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the 'Common Mistakes' and 'Red Flags' sections overlap substantially (both cover providing context, verifying, and avoiding trivial updates) and could be consolidated. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Checklists, an exact subagent type, 'git status', and a copy-paste format template are concrete, but the central dispatch is shown as 'Task(subagent_type: nori-change-documenter)' inside a bash block, which is non-executable pseudocode rather than the real tool-call form. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear three-step sequence (Gather Context -> Dispatch -> Verify) with Step 3 as an explicit verification checkpoint and per-step checklists provides the validation/feedback loop the rubric rewards. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is self-contained with no bundle files, well-organized into clearly labeled sections, and contains no nested references; the inline format template is core content that belongs in SKILL.md. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |