Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, mostly lean instruction skill with concrete directives and a clear sequenced procedure plus a failure-mode checklist. It is held back from top marks by minor redundancy and the absence of explicit validation/feedback loops.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence, using compact bad/good example pairs rather than explaining concepts Claude already knows; minor redundancy across failure-mode examples keeps it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, executable directives ('Use Read tool to read the skill', 'announce you are using it', 'Create TodoWrite todos') with exact phrasings in good examples; as an instruction-only skill this is mostly actionable with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The <required> block lays out a clear three-step sequence and the failure-mode section acts as a checklist; the skill is non-destructive so the simple-skill exception applies, though no explicit validation/feedback loop is present to reach 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clearly headed sections (required block, failure modes, announcing usage, how to read) in a single self-contained file with no nested references; structure is good with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |