Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers concrete, copy-paste-ready instruction (exact templates and tool calls) in a well-organized single file, though it carries some redundant anti-pattern examples. The core workflow is clearly sequenced but embeds its validation checkpoints only implicitly via examples rather than as explicit numbered steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but repeated bad-example variants (e.g., four near-identical TodoWrite anti-patterns) could be tightened, matching 'mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary content'; not 1 because no padded concept explanations are present. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and copy-paste ready with exact announcement templates, explicit 'Use Read tool', and literal TodoWrite() call syntax, matching the 'fully executable... specific examples' anchor; absence of code is not penalized for an instruction-only skill per the code_vs_instruction_skills note. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The required workflow is clearly sequenced (read, announce, create todos) but validation checkpoints are only implicit — confirming relevance before announcing appears in examples, not as an explicit numbered step — matching 'steps listed but validation gaps'; not 1 because the sequence is clear. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with no nested references and clearly organized sections (required, failure modes, announcing, how to read), which the simple_skills note permits to score 3 when well-organized without external references; no bundle files exist to layer. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |