Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable instruction skill: concrete markdown templates and a test checklist give clear execution guidance, and sections are cleanly organized. It falls just short of top marks due to minor padding, placeholder-dependent templates, and the absence of an explicit plan-level validation checkpoint.
Suggestions
Tighten the Overview by collapsing the three consecutive 'Assume they…' sentences into a single concise assumption statement to remove minor padding.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the workflow (e.g., 'Review the plan against the test section before presenting') so the produced plan is verified, not just the tests.
Replace embedded <system-reminder> tags with neutral instructional framing, since those tags are harness-level constructs and may not render as intended in a SKILL.md body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean — copy-paste markdown templates and terse checklists — but the repeated 'Assume they…' lines and chatty asides ('questionable taste') add minor padding, fitting 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' rather than the fully lean 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, copy-paste-ready header/test/footer templates plus a specific test checklist, but templates carry placeholder brackets and the actual plan content is feature-dependent, matching 'mostly executable guidance; minor gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Todo sequence (read guidelines → create plan → consider compat/edge cases/questions → emphasize testing → present) and a validation checklist for tests exist, but there is no explicit checkpoint validating the produced plan itself, fitting score 4 over 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The file is self-contained and well-organized with clear section headers (Overview, Header, Test Section, Footer) and no bundle files to reference, matching 'good structure; minor organization gaps'; with no references to signal it does not reach the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |