Turn a mission or lab idea into a fully researched GitHub issue spec on microsoft/agent-academy, then post it with the GitHub CLI. Use this skill whenever the user wants to propose new Agent Academy content before writing it — course missions (Recruit, Operative, Commander), standalone Special Ops, or Cowork Collective missions. Trigger whenever the user says "write a spec for a mission", "create an issue for a new lab", "I want to propose a Special Ops", "file a mission proposal", "spec out a lab", "open an issue for a new module", or hands over Microsoft Learn URLs and asks to turn them into an Agent Academy lab. This skill handles: mining source documentation, interviewing for scope, repo reconnaissance and duplicate detection across both docs and existing issues, frontmatter and tag validation, writing-style conformance, drafting the issue body, title conventions, milestone and assignee metadata, and posting plus verifying the issue via `gh`.
72
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Low
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
The runtime workflow ingests outsider-authored free text when it “fetch[es] all of [user-supplied] URLs” (Phase 1) and extracts their contents into the spec (and also reads GitHub issues list/search results and issue back content in Phases 3 and 8).
20368c1
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.