Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable tool-routing skill with concrete MCP tools, library IDs, and version-gated guidance. It is concise and well-organized, with the main weakness being incidental boilerplate (the translation disclaimer) rather than structural issues.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean — routing tables, brief tool descriptions, and tight query examples — with only minor trimmable padding such as the Co-op Translator disclaimer boilerplate; assumes Claude's competence rather than over-explaining. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully actionable: names exact tools (microsoft_docs_search, microsoft_code_sample_search, microsoft_docs_fetch), concrete Context7 library IDs, a sequenced resolve-then-query setup, and copy-ready good/bad query examples covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear default-then-exception routing with version-gated guidance (Aspire CLI 13.2+ vs 13.1) and a numbered Context7 setup sequence; a search/routing skill without destructive steps, so validation checkpoints are less critical, but minor gaps keep it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly signaled sections (default MCP, per-category exceptions, Context7 setup, query writing) with no bundle files present; self-contained content is appropriately placed, with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |