Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-organized guardrails skill that assumes Claude's competence and stays lean, with its only real gap being the absence of worked examples that would make the wording rules concrete and copy-paste applicable.
Suggestions
Add a before/after error-message example that demonstrates the 'failure, cause, and one next action' rule in practice.
Include a short sample of command help text or first-run output showing the humans-vs-agents (--verbose) output distinction.
Show one flow compared against the npm/pip/cargo/gh mental model with the justified deviation spelled out.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and bullet-driven with no concept explanation (it assumes Claude knows Click, npm/pip/cargo/gh), and every line earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The rules are concrete directives ('Every error names the failure, the cause, and one next action'; 'Default output is for humans; --verbose is for agents'), but no worked examples (e.g., a good vs bad error message) demonstrate the desired output, leaving application slightly underspecified for a wording-quality skill. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-purpose guardrails skill under 50 lines with two clearly organized sections and no destructive/batch operation, so the simple-skills note allows a 3 without an explicit multi-step workflow. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections and a single clearly-signaled, one-level reference (the persona link), satisfying the simple-skills allowance for progressive disclosure. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |