Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-organized instruction skill with no wasted tokens. Its main gap is actionability — it states rules directionally without a concrete example (help string or error message) — and it lacks an explicit verify/feedback step for the flows it governs.
Suggestions
Add one concrete example, e.g. a before/after error rewrite showing 'name the failure, the cause, and one next action', to make the rule copy-paste ready.
Add a brief verification checkpoint, such as 'Re-read the rendered --help output and the worst-case error path before considering a CLI change done.'
Confirm the persona link path resolves in the bundle, or inline a one-line pointer so the reference is not orphaned.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean throughout — every line is a concrete rule or trigger condition with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, e.g. 'Default output is for humans; --verbose is for agents.' | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Rules are concrete and reference specific files and commands (e.g. 'src/apm_cli/cli.py', 'apm init, apm install, apm run'), but there is no executable code, example help string, or example error message to copy, so guidance is directional rather than copy-paste ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | 'When to activate' and 'Key rules' are clearly listed, but there is no sequenced workflow or validation checkpoint; given the skill governs error wording and command flows, a verify step (e.g. re-read help output / confirm error names failure+cause+action) is missing. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no bundle files, the body is well-organized into two clear sections (When to activate, Key rules) plus a persona reference link, satisfying the simple-skill allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |