Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean rule set: crisp activation triggers, directive and checkable UX rules, and an explicit boundary against a sibling skill. Its only gaps are the absence of a worked example and one broken external persona link.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line is a directive with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; assertions like 'npm / pip / cargo / gh mental models' and '--verbose is for agents' are stated without over-explanation, matching the lean anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The rules are concrete and checkable ('Every error names the failure, the cause, and one next action') and name specific mental models and surfaces (help= strings, docstrings), but there is no worked example such as a before/after error message, so it fits anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines whose single action is unambiguous: exhaustive activation criteria plus directive rules, with an explicit scope boundary deferring logging decisions to another skill. The rubric's simple-skill exemption applies and no destructive/batch validation cap is triggered. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | With no bundle files and a short, well-organized body ('When to activate' / 'Key rules') the simple-skill exemption would merit 5, but the persona link points outside the skill bundle to a nonexistent path (../../../.apm/agents/devx-ux-expert.agent.md), a minor navigation gap matching anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |