Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured architect skill that gives concrete templates, a clear step sequence, and an explicit validation gate against hard rules. It could move from strong to excellent by adding an executable verification step for the structural-shape match and tightening a few redundant framing sentences.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verify/retry loop after Step 4 (e.g. re-run the promise-validation checks against the emitted JSON before returning) to push workflow clarity toward a 5 for this design-pass skill.
Trim framing redundancies like 'You are NOT the writer... You are the TOC architect' and 'The structural shape drives the TOC delta shape' which restate what the steps already make concrete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence (e.g. 'Load .apm/docs-index.yml entirely. Inspect chapters[], pages[], promises[]. This is your map.'), with only minor spots that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready YAML and JSON templates for new_page, moved_page, retired_page, and the final report schema, with minor gaps around exact command invocation. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps with an explicit validation checkpoint in Step 4 ('Apply these hard rules. If any fails, redesign') and a feedback loop, though it is guidance-level rather than a verify-and-retry command loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections (When to invoke, Inputs, Steps 1-5, Output contract, Anti-patterns) with no bundle files needed; structure is clear and navigable, just shy of the ideal 'overview pointing to one-level-deep references' shape. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |