Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a model of token-efficient skill authoring: a tight intent-to-tool routing table, a short sequenced workflow with safety checkpoints for state-changing operations, and clean section organization. The only meaningful improvement would be a small example of tool invocation parameters to close the minor actionability gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean ~37 lines of table plus numbered steps with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; terse directives like "Never count a capped list" and "Resource-group scope requires a subscription" assume full competence. Every token earns its place, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The intent-to-tool table assigns concrete, specific tools for each intent (advisor_recommendation_summary for aggregates, advisor_recommendation_update for state changes), which is actionable guidance for an instruction-only skill. It falls short of anchor 5 only in lacking parameter or invocation examples (e.g., the expected scope format). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence with a checkpoint before the risky operation ("Confirm before recommendation-state updates") and an output-verification step ("Present only returned data, including truncation, access limitations, and errors"). There is no error-recovery/feedback loop, so it does not reach anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and needs no external references; per the rubric's guideline, well-organized sections (Quick reference, Workflow, Safety) earn a 5, and the body has exactly that with no inlined content that belongs in separate files. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |