Conciseness

The body is dense and operational — commands, routing tables, and guard conditions with no concept padding — but the `cd -- '<working_dir>' || exit 1` boilerplate is repeated verbatim in eight bash blocks, and the invocation-scope prose ("An approved child reuses only its owner's current scope...") is repetitive legalese that could be tightened. Anchor 3 ("mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened") fits; not 4 because the repeated guard boilerplate and duplicated scope language are more than minor.

Actionability

Fully executable guidance throughout: exact CLI commands per connector shape (`$PA app add data-source`, `connection list-datasets`, `list-procedures`), a complete parameter reference, a delegation table with connector API-name aliases, concrete grep patterns with file paths, and a per-file inspection list. Specific commands cover the common cases (action-style, table-based, SQL stored procedures). Clear match to anchor 5.

Workflow Clarity

A six-step workflow with a summary checklist, telemetry checkpoints, BLOCKED guards on every shell block, and an explicit validate-fix-retry loop in Step 5 (`npx --no-install tsc --noEmit` followed by "Fix TypeScript errors before proceeding"). Removal, refresh, and cloud-flow branches return early with explicit stop conditions. Matches anchor 5 ("clear sequence with explicit validation steps; feedback loops for error recovery; checklists for complex processes").

Progressive Disclosure

Detailed material (connector reference, data-source removal, dependency planning, working-directory resolution) is delegated one level deep to clearly linked files, keeping the body to workflow plus routing — good structure per anchor 4. Not anchor 5 because the same shared files are referenced with inconsistent path notation (`${PLUGIN_ROOT}/shared/...` vs `../../shared/...`), and no local references/ or scripts/ bundle exists here to verify the referenced targets against.

Specificity

"adding a Power Platform connector to an Expo/React Native Power Apps mobile app" names the domain and a single concrete action, but the description lists no other capabilities (connection resolution, dataset/table discovery, generated services, schema regeneration). Anchor 3 ("names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive") is the closest fit; it is above anchor 2 because the action is concrete rather than generic, and below anchor 4 because there are not several specific actions.

Completeness

The "when" is explicit and even conditional ("and no dedicated mobile connector skill exists"), but the "what" is only implied by the action verb inside the trigger clause — no separate statement of what the skill does (discover connections, generate typed services, verify the build). Falls between anchor 3 and anchor 4; not 5 because the "what" lacks explicit capability phrasing with concrete triggers.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases a user would say are present ("adding a Power Platform connector", "Power Apps mobile app"), but common variations and synonyms are missing — e.g. "data source", "connection", and specific connector names like SharePoint, SQL, Dataverse, or Teams. Matches anchor 3 ("some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms"); not anchor 4 because the synonym coverage is thin.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is highly specific (Power Platform connectors in an Expo/React Native Power Apps mobile app) and the clause "no dedicated mobile connector skill exists" explicitly disambiguates it from the dedicated /add-* connector skills. Clear match to anchor 5 ("clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk").