Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced workflow skill with executable gh commands and explicit verification guidance. Minor conciseness and progressive-disclosure gaps (some repetition, inline guidelines overlapping a referenced file) keep it just below top marks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Instruction-dense with no basic-concept padding, but the Step 2.5 reconciliation rules are partly restated in the Step 3 area and the inline Writing guidelines overlap the referenced instructions file, so a few sections could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready `gh` CLI queries with exact search strings and `--json` field lists, concrete filename/heading examples, and specific formatting tokens like `setting(setting.name)` and the `<video>` tag template. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequence (locate file → identify features → build sections → verify → write) with an explicit "Verify technical details" checkpoint and skip/ask rules, but lacks a tight validate-fix-retry feedback loop on the written output. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with one-level-deep references to external instructions files and templates; no bundle files exist, and the long inline Writing guidelines could arguably defer to the referenced instructions doc. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |