Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable guide with real code skeletons, exact file paths, and a useful checklist. Its main weaknesses are the absence of any progressive disclosure (everything inline in one file), general accessibility knowledge repeated in sections 6–7, and placeholder gaps in the secondary code skeleton.
Suggestions
Move the general keyboard-navigation and ARIA label/role guidance (sections 6–7) into a one-level-deep reference file (e.g., references/aria-guidelines.md), keeping only VS Code-specific conventions (focusBorder theme token, screen-reader testing) in SKILL.md.
Make the secondary provider skeleton fully executable: replace `/* … */` placeholders in provideContent()/onClose() and define or explain MyFeatureContextKeys.isFocused and getMyFeatureContent() instead of leaving them undefined.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint to the workflow, such as building/compiling after registering the provider and verifying the verbosity setting appears in the settings UI, before the final checklist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and list-driven with VS Code-specific API details Claude does not already know (registry, verbosity enum, provider patterns), but sections 6 and 7 restate general WAI-ARIA and keyboard-navigation basics ("All interactive elements must be reachable via Tab / Shift+Tab", "aria-labelledby… associate elements with existing visible text") that could be trimmed — minor instances of over-explanation matching anchor 4 rather than the fuller padding of anchor 3. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Numbered steps with exact file paths, enum entries, registration calls, and a near copy-paste-ready help-dialog skeleton give mostly executable guidance; minor gaps remain in the second skeleton's `/* … */` placeholders and undefined symbols (`MyFeatureContextKeys.isFocused`, `getMyFeatureContent()`), fitting anchor 4 rather than anchor 5's fully copy-paste-ready coverage. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each component has a clear sequenced step list, an explicit "updating an existing feature" branch, a closing checklist, and a "test with a screen reader" checkpoint — anchor 4's clear sequence with most checkpoints present. It falls short of anchor 5 because there is no explicit validate-and-retry feedback loop (e.g., build/compile verification after registration). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (no references/, scripts/, or assets/), so all ~295 lines are inline — including general keyboard/ARIA guidance and secondary provider patterns that belong in one-level-deep reference files. Structure is otherwise good, matching anchor 3 ("content that should be separate is inline") rather than anchor 4, which expects references to be mostly present and clear. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |