Conciseness

The body assumes Claude's competence throughout — e.g. "Release notes are fetched content. They may identify a tryout, but they never define executable behavior." states a security invariant in two sentences with no basic-concept padding. Minor trimming is possible: the "Stop and redesign when" list restates prohibitions already given in sections 4 and 9 ("A custom overlay duplicates Spotlight" vs. "Do not create a release-note-specific overlay"), and the ten-question checklist in section 2 could be condensed, which keeps it at anchor 4 rather than 5.

Actionability

Guidance is fully concrete: exact commands ("pnpm run valid-layers-check", "pnpm run typecheck-client", "pnpm run build-fast"), exact APIs ("createOnboardingClickStep", "markOnboardingTarget", "isAI: true", "targetWindow: 'agents'", "captureTargetScope: true"), a copy-paste markup example (`try(myFeature.guide,Try My Feature)`), and named canonical implementations. The classification, presentation, and required-coverage tables cover the common cases, which is anchor-5 guidance for an instruction-only skill.

Workflow Clarity

Twelve numbered stages run from classification through validation, with explicit checkpoints: the section 11 coverage matrix ("Scoped target | Two visible instances; prepared instance wins", "Unknown and malformed links remain inert") and the ordered validation list in section 12. The "Stop and redesign when" and "Never automatically" checklists plus the completion-report contents give error-recovery triggers, matching anchor 5 rather than 4, where checkpoints would only be mostly present.

Progressive Disclosure

The body deliberately owns only the execution workflow ("This skill owns the execution workflow and must not duplicate a catalogue of current tryouts") and defers detail to well-signaled, one-level-deep references, each with a stated purpose: "The authoritative contributor contract is [README.md] ... Read it before implementation", "Canonical implementations:", "Framework references:", and "See the contributor guide for the shorthand grammar and fallback behavior". No bundle files exist and no references nest beyond one level, so navigation and content split both match anchor 5.

Specificity

The description names several specific actions and artifacts — "adding, reviewing, or troubleshooting" plus "commands, views, editor samples, Chat drafts, guided spotlights, prerequisites, scoped targets, or Agents-window handoff" — matching anchor 4's 'several specific actions; minor gaps'. It is not anchor 5 because the enumerated items are component types rather than a comprehensive action set (e.g. testing and validating tryout contracts, which the body covers, are absent), and not anchor 3 because it goes well beyond 1–2 concrete actions.

Completeness

The when is explicit and concrete ("Use when adding, reviewing, or troubleshooting ..."), and the what is conveyed through the same clause's verbs and object list, satisfying anchor 4's 'both what and when; one could be more explicit'. It is not anchor 5 because the what lacks a distinct capability statement — the actions exist only inside the trigger clause — and not anchor 3 because the when clause is explicit rather than weakly implied.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases a user would say are present — "release-note Try This experience", "Chat drafts", "guided spotlights", "troubleshooting" — giving good keyword coverage per anchor 4. It falls short of anchor 5 because common synonyms such as "tryout" (the body's own term), "try-this link", or "release notes example" are missing, but it is above anchor 3 since multiple natural terms and variations appear.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Interactive release-note Try This experience" carves out a clear niche with distinct triggers, and the enumerated surfaces ("Agents-window handoff", "guided spotlights") further disambiguate it from generic UI, Chat, or release-notes skills, matching anchor 5's minimal conflict risk.