Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean and reasonably actionable with real CLI examples and compact tables, but it falls short on operational rigor: the workflow lacks validation checkpoints, and most of its reference links point to files that are missing from the bundle. Fixing the broken references and adding error-handling steps would lift both weak dimensions.
Suggestions
Create the missing references/WRITING-TASKS.md and references/GRADERS.md files, or remove their links from the References section — two of three linked files are dead.
Add validation checkpoints to the Workflow, e.g., what to do when eval.yaml is missing or a task file fails to parse, before proceeding to execution and reporting.
Ground the abstract Workflow steps with the actual commands (e.g., the waza CLI invocation for each stage) instead of leaving them as high-level descriptions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is table-driven and terse ('Code Graders: Deterministic assertions, regex matching') with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Minor redundancy remains — the 'When to Use' bullets largely duplicate the description's USE FOR list, and the tagline/intro sentence adds little — so it falls just short of the every-token-earns-its-place anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides executable commands ('waza run ./my-skill/eval.yaml -o results.json') and a concrete sample results JSON. However, the Workflow steps are abstract ('Parse task definitions from tasks/*.yaml', 'Run each task through the configured graders') without the corresponding commands, leaving minor gaps typical of the mostly-executable anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step sequence (Check for Eval Suite, Load Tasks, Execute, Report) is clearly ordered, but validation checkpoints are entirely absent — no handling of a missing or malformed eval.yaml, no verify-before-report loop. This matches the sequence-present-but-checkpoints-missing anchor rather than the minor-gaps level above. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized and references are one level deep and clearly labeled, but 2 of the 3 referenced files (references/WRITING-TASKS.md and references/GRADERS.md) do not exist in the bundle — only EVAL-SPEC.md is present. Dead reference links are a substantial navigation failure, keeping this at the some-structure-but-could-be-better-organized anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |