Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, highly actionable single-file skill with executable commands, explicit triage and validation feedback loops, and a well-signaled external README reference. The only soft spot is progressive disclosure, where some inlined reference material could live in separate files.
Suggestions
Move the canonical-corpus setup detail (sync-fuzz-corpus.ts / build-bench-corpus.ts walkthrough) and the stable weakness-name enumeration into a short referenced file or appendix so the main body stays a lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean throughout with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line is actionable command, triage, or procedure, e.g. 'Use `packages/fuzz` after focused rule tests pass. Read its `README.md` for harness architecture and corpus setup.' | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready commands throughout ('FUZZ_RULE=<rule-id> FUZZ_STRICT=1 FUZZ_ITERATIONS=500 nr fuzz', 'bun scripts/hunt-false-positives.ts') plus a numbered preserve-FP procedure with exact fixture paths, covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (run harness → confirm rule fires → triage → preserve → report) with explicit validation/feedback loops: 'Confirm that the target rule fires... If it stays silent, add a triggering shape... and rerun' and 'Run `nr -C packages/fuzz test` and replay the target rule.' | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference ('Read its `README.md` for harness architecture and corpus setup'), but the canonical-corpus paragraph and the full weakness-name list are inlined rather than split out, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |