Content
42%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content shows a well-structured ten-phase workflow with concrete tool names and thresholds, but it is fundamentally incomplete because every detailed artifact it points to (phase details, scoring rubric, report template, tool reference) is a referenced file that does not exist. This broken progressive disclosure, combined with missing executable code and inter-phase validation checkpoints, caps several dimensions at 2.
Suggestions
Add the four referenced bundle files (PHASE_DETAILS.md, REPORT_TEMPLATE.md, TOOL_REFERENCE.md, QUICK_START.md) so the deferred signal-classification table, 0-100 scoring rubric, executable Python examples, and report template are actually reachable.
Include at least one copy-paste-ready executable code example for the disproportionality computation (PRR/ROR/IC with confidence intervals) directly in SKILL.md or its referenced phase-details file, rather than only naming the tools.
Insert explicit validation checkpoints between phases (e.g. confirm N>=3 and lower CI > 1.0 before classifying a signal; branch to the 'No FAERS reports' path after Phase 1) so the batch workflow has feedback loops for error recovery.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and mostly high-signal (exact thresholds like 'PRR >= 2.0, N >= 3, lower CI > 1.0', tool names, scoring component weights) without explaining concepts Claude already knows, but it is long and defers key tables and formulae to external files, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It names specific tools and exact signal criteria, which is actionable for tool selection, but all executable Python code and the actual 0-100 scoring rubric are deferred to PHASE_DETAILS.md — providing some concrete guidance but missing key executable details. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The ten-phase pipeline is clearly sequenced with an ASCII flow diagram and an edge-cases section, but this batch analysis lacks explicit inter-phase validation checkpoints (e.g. verify N>=3 before proceeding), which the rubric says should cap workflow clarity at 2 for batch operations. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body explicitly defers the signal-classification table, scoring rubric, code examples, and report template to PHASE_DETAILS.md, REPORT_TEMPLATE.md, TOOL_REFERENCE.md, and QUICK_START.md, but none of these referenced files actually exist in the bundle, so the promised one-level-deep detail is unreachable. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |