Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, action-oriented body with verified tool parameters and a clear phased workflow, weakened primarily by a broken external reference to a missing ANALYSIS_DETAILS.md that holds the promised code snippets.
Suggestions
Add the referenced ANALYSIS_DETAILS.md to the skill bundle (or inline the key code snippets) so the 'see ANALYSIS_DETAILS.md' pointer resolves to real content.
Tighten the Clinical Reasoning Strategies prose into terser bullet criteria to lift conciseness toward the lean anchor.
Add an explicit per-phase validate/retry note (e.g., confirm a CIViC match before tiering) so the workflow's checkpoints are as explicit as its sequence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient: tables, terse principles, and offloaded code snippets keep the body lean, with only minor stretches of prose in the reasoning-strategy sections that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete and executable in most places — verified tool parameter tables and an exact ESM_explain_variant_mechanism call signature — but the bulk of copy-paste code is deferred to a referenced file rather than shown inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 8-phase workflow with an explicit Phase 0 parameter-verification checkpoint and a Fallback Strategy for error recovery; checkpoints are present though not articulated as a per-phase validate/retry loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good internal section structure, but the single one-level-deep reference ('see ANALYSIS_DETAILS.md') points to a file that is not present in the bundle, so the intended content split is unrealized and navigation is broken. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |