Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable clinical workflow with strong tool-parameter verification and reasoning guidance. The main defect is a broken progressive-disclosure reference: ANALYSIS_DETAILS.md is cited but not shipped, leaving the detailed code snippets it promises unavailable.
Suggestions
Ship the missing ANALYSIS_DETAILS.md (or place it under references/) so the 'detailed code snippets and API call patterns for each phase' reference resolves; alternatively inline the few key code snippets and drop the reference.
Add explicit validation checkpoints between phases (e.g., 'before Phase 4, confirm a CIViC variant match exists; if not, run the PubMed fallback') rather than only the upfront Phase 0 check and the trailing fallback list.
Tighten the Clinical Reasoning Strategies prose — convert explanatory sentences like 'Not every mutation in a tumor is driving the cancer' into directive bullets to recover token budget.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with dense, useful tool tables and lean principle statements, though the Clinical Reasoning Strategies section carries prose ('Not every mutation in a tumor is driving the cancer') that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete tool/parameter guidance — verified WRONG-vs-CORRECT parameter tables, response key fields, and fallback rules — but no inline executable code snippets; those are deferred to the missing ANALYSIS_DETAILS.md, a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight clearly sequenced phases with a CRITICAL Phase 0 parameter-verification checkpoint and a Fallback Strategy error-recovery loop, but lacks explicit per-phase validation checkpoints and the completeness checklist mentioned in Phase 8 is not actually provided. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-sectioned structure with a clearly signaled one-level reference ('see ANALYSIS_DETAILS.md'), but that file is absent from the bundle (no references/ directory exists), so the promised detailed code snippets are unreachable — a broken reference rather than a minor gap. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |